Posted on 02/14/2017 3:15:41 AM PST by Pinkbell
Deep State has been trying to undermine Flynn for a year. He is particularly dangerous to them because he was inside the belly of the beast as head of DIA and knows the game. But Flynn had been PNG since he revealed, when head of DIA, that the U.S. was supporting jihadis and even ISIS indirectly to overthrow Assad. Deep State and the puppet masters have regime change in Syria on their to-do list.
Russia's intervention in Syria has also put them on the regime change list for the puppet masters. In fact, the overthrow of the Ukrainian government in the coup occurred after and in response to Russia deciding to intervene in stopping the attack on the Syria government (in the Gulf of Tonkin-esque "red line" and bogus staged chemical attack) and giving direct support to the jihadis in doing this. Russia is our enemy because they stand in the way of the puppet masters' designs. Flynn's bellicosity toward Iran was not enough to make the puppet masters back off. After all, it's already assumed that Iran must be destroyed as well. To think otherwise now makes you a traitor, almost like WMD agnosticism in 2003.
The last 4 weeks have shown that the federal courts will control our domestic policy for the puppet masters who want open borders, Islam and multiculturalism. Now we see our foreign policy will be controlled by Deep State for the puppet masters who want to make the world safe for Davos and the financial globalist interests.
Who is correct, yesterday Townhall said resigned, today, another story.
Report: No Expectations Flynn Will Be Fired
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2017/02/13/report-no-expectations-flynn-will-be-fired-n2285257
Not sure what the real story is here, but Flynn was excellent and he may have been a Democrat, but he was a solid supporter of President Trump and a man who served our country and rose through the ranks. He spoke honestly about Islam and knows what we’re facing with it and exposed Obama’s incompetence. Sorry for him to go.
He didn’t lie that he had conversations. The question is the content. The accusation is that he denied about discussing sanctions, but when you look at the NYT, WaPo, and WSJ, he never said sanctions would be lifted. He basically said to hold off on retaliating and gave “an impression” that the sanctions would be lifted. The WSJ doesn’t even go that far as to say he gave an impression. Overall, he said that things could be reviewed when Trump got in.
I think it’s stretching it to say that he told a big lie or thought what he said was a big deal. What has been printed as being said in the NYT, WaPo, and WSJ doesn’t come off to me like a big deal.
He couldn’t have told them that they were lifting the sanctions because the sanctions are still in place and will be per Nikki Haley.
His tweets are troubling. Using the word scapegoat ...he should keep his mouth shut. I am waiting for the claim he was told what to say.
Well said.
Bannon sole policy advisor????
And why is this a good thing?
Those people cheerring at the Pentagon and CIA....thanks for outing yourselves, dummies
And look at the timing. AG Sessions is finally in place. One can't help but think he's got a lot of work to do.
This is pure speculation - conspiracy theory - on my part. I just don't see anything that contradicts the way I'm connecting the dots.
bttt
But the Washington Post won’t investigate illegal aliens voting.
Obama tried to start a war with Russia based on claims that Russia tried “influencing” the US election. If Flynn or any other US citizen spoke to Russians reminding them that Obama is toothless now, then good for them.
They thwarted the plans of a man who was illegally put into office through crimes such as forgery, murder, extortion, etc, aided and abetted by the US media which had also been threatened with political annihilation by the FCC if they reported truthfully (akin to the now-blatantly-obvious political machinations of the IRS, the illegal theft from Chrysler’s secured investors to give the money to the union thugs who used threats of violence against Oama’s opponents, the political use of leaks and/or anonymous claims of wrongdoing throughout the Obama regime to commit a “Night of the Long Knives” against patriotic military leadership, etc).
The US bureaucracy is an enemy of the US Constitution, point blank. It is a political machine, used for political purposes, and it is in bed with the crooks in the media who also hate the US Constitution. The swamp is really, really deep and wide.
For a long time many of us have suspected that the surveillance done for supposed “national security” reasons is actually being used to threaten/bribe critical people has actually been shown in two cases now - Petraeus and Flynn. With Petraeus there was actual bad behavior substantiated by the leaks. But now the machine has moved on from even that standard and has learned that they can use these recordings in the media to get rid of somebody based merely on the claim of an “impression” that was given.
How many Congress-critters have been told that their recordings will be used in this same way if they don’t vote this or that way?
What we are seeing is the true nature of the bureaucracy - a Hydra that corrupts everything it possibly touches, and with the “national security” surveillance being done now that means EVERYTHING. They now touch EVERYTHING.
My daughter’s roommate mentioned that “the government shut down the National Park Service tweets because they talked about global warming”. What the heck is the National Park Service doing, tweeting about global warming? What the heck does global warming have to do with national parks? We have GOT to get agencies back to just minding their own business, literally. Just do what you were hired to do and cut the crap.
We also discussed Betsy De Vos, and I said I know nothing about that but just being honest, if the NEA is against her I will automatically assume that she must be doing something right, because the NEA has long since lost any credibility on educational issues since they have become, instead, a racketeering group for liberal causes like abortion, homosexuality, etc. And the Education Dept is just the official tool through which the NEA does its political goals.
That’s not even going into Lois Lerner and the IRS. It’s not going into the firings of inspectors general who actually DID their job (like Gerald Walpin). It’s not going into a huge story that will come out (and be ignored by the media, I’m sure) about a big-time con by the FAA, NTSB, SEALs, Navy, Coast Guard, several corporations, the media, and individuals who were bought off - all part of a big hoax intended to hide Obama’s ineligibility and the crimes committed to illegally put him into our White House.
The bureaucracy is a political tool with immense power. It is totally unchecked, totally out of control. It will kill this nation if we don’t get it back to some semblance of accountability.
What you’ve said is true: Flynn is just the start. I don’t know the best way to fight all this but I know beyond any shadow of a doubt that the corrupt-government beast needs to be slain, and until somebody actuallly suffers consequences for playing politics with what is supposed to be “national security”, the beast has a weapon that holds honest governance hostage.
One word - trust.
All Flynn had to do was from day one lay out, directly to Pence and Trump, the entirety of his conversation, including it’s ambiguity. Trust would have been established and the ambiguity of the conversation would satisfy a diplomatic defense for it.
THAT - generating trust, was Flynn’s error. He was in one of the kinds of positions where that trust is of paramount importance.
I honestly don’t think he said anything wrong. It sounded like generalities to me to just hold off before retaliating (which obviously the liberals the to retaliate) and that things can be discussed in the new administration and perhaps they can forge a better relationship. The most the media could say was that he gave the “impression” that the sanctions may be lifted. He never said they would be, and they weren’t. In fact, Haley was out there saying they wouldn’t be until Russia is out of Crimea.
That said, I think this could be bad for Trump for the reason that the media is reporting that Sally Yates told Trump about this last month - several weeks ago, yet he didn’t make an issue of it until the media did, and supposedly just now Pence feels lied to. The media is now on a witchhunt. If he hadn’t of let him go, he could have said he didn’t think it was a big deal and that’s why he kept him, but now that he has, they want to know why he waited.
I wonder who the leaker is....in this case, probably sally yates ?
He should have never lied to Pence.
Pray America woke
The left, who was very critical of the CIA and intelligence agencies under Bush, suddenly LOVES them. Suddenly the left has embraced neocon talking points like globalism and warmongering (they would have followed Hillary into WWIII with Russia). One of their favorite people on Twitter is former CIA agent and Trump opponent Evan McMullin who is actually nastier than Democrats. Where did this CIA guy suddenly come from anyway? The left loves the deep state right now, but someday, maybe the deep state will do the same thing to a leftist President. Then we can watch them howl.
But as I illustrated in the post, it wasn’t the lie it’s being made out to be, and that’s from the fine print of the NYT, WaPo, and WSJ.
>> He [Flynn] may have been Obama tool to embarrass Trump <<
Don’t think so.
More likely he was just an old-fashioned KGB asset — if not an actual “mole” then maybe a “useful idiot.”
>> If the Logan Act meant anything . . . <
Then Jimmah Carter and Jesse Jackson would be serving life terms in cells next to Bernie Madoff at the Butner Federal Correctional Facility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.