Posted on 10/06/2016 11:43:11 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Doddering, feeble, incompetent, and paranoid
Imagine you’re Hillary Clinton. Your entire life is spent hiding the basic truths of your existence. You lie about your resume, your husband, your career, your money, your foundation, your scandals, and your agenda. Nothing - absolutely nothing - you present to the American people is genuine, aside from your contempt for those who dare defy you.
That means you have to live out your days in a massive bubble of fear and paranoia.
Let’s face it. At any moment, you could blow it all. Someone could ask you a tough question, and you could forget which lie you’re supposed to offer as an answer. Since you’ve told so many, your lies could contradict each other. Worse, you could flub the response and reveal the truth about what you want to do for to the United States.
she also has to take a week off to prepare for a stupid debate
She is a programmed Robot.
Just so everyone knows, when a candidate supplies the questions, the interview becomes a free ad.
Indeed—Trump should demand equal time with the same rules (i.e., questions provided in advance and no deviation from the script).
She cannot think on her feet.
Can’t open a pickle jar either....unless it’s been opened already. I’m 72. I sure would have given it a REAL try. I hardly would classify opening a pickle jar as my annual physical.
When Matt Lauer had THE NERVE to ask her some real questions she screamed back stage about getting him fired and “If we lose that fascist f**k will have our heads in a noose”
I am waiting for SOMEONE in her staff to start thinking “who’s this ‘we’ you’re talking about...”
But the real question is did she have the questions from Lester Holt in the first debate?
Maybe ISIS and Russia and China will give her an advance on their activities so she’ll know how to respond.
Not just Hillary...what kind of “slug” is Harvey for allowing it?!
Unless of course she is medically “peaking” for an event which would otherwise threaten to betray that she has Parkinson’s Disease (if indeed that is so).Certainly, Trump doesn’t need to risk claiming directly that she is a Parkinson’s sufferer, but it would be really effective if he were to point out their mutual (within 2 years) age and, after pointing out Reagan’s success at the same age, mention that the Internet claims one of the candidates has Parkinson’s. He could then say that he had asked his doctor directly if he had it, explain a test which the Dr. showed him which could be demonstrated on TV, and then use it to demonstrate to all doctors in the TV audience that he is not afflicted by it.
He wouldn’t have to say a word to Hillary directly. But if she didn’t do the same thing, the unmistakable implication would be that she does have it. And if so, the challenge would best be given near the end of the debate, when her medicine would be wearing off. IMHO the risk/reward ratio on that seems pretty favorable . . .
I believe the answer is yes. Sure looked like the "cleaner" handed Holt something he took off Hillary's podium after the debate, and Holt didn't get anything from Trump's podium.
Survey says! (ding)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.