she also has to take a week off to prepare for a stupid debate
She is a programmed Robot.
Unless of course she is medically “peaking” for an event which would otherwise threaten to betray that she has Parkinson’s Disease (if indeed that is so).Certainly, Trump doesn’t need to risk claiming directly that she is a Parkinson’s sufferer, but it would be really effective if he were to point out their mutual (within 2 years) age and, after pointing out Reagan’s success at the same age, mention that the Internet claims one of the candidates has Parkinson’s. He could then say that he had asked his doctor directly if he had it, explain a test which the Dr. showed him which could be demonstrated on TV, and then use it to demonstrate to all doctors in the TV audience that he is not afflicted by it.
He wouldn’t have to say a word to Hillary directly. But if she didn’t do the same thing, the unmistakable implication would be that she does have it. And if so, the challenge would best be given near the end of the debate, when her medicine would be wearing off. IMHO the risk/reward ratio on that seems pretty favorable . . .