Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz supporters: Did Cruz's comments change your mind on him?
vanity | March 12, 2016 | Kevin "Coach" Collins

Posted on 03/12/2016 10:35:57 AM PST by jmaroneps37

I am a Trump supporter but I would like to know if Cruz's comments about Chicago changed the mind of any of his supporters. Is it A) no difference I still support Cruz B) I am rethinking my support for Cruz C) I am now going to support another candidate or not voting?


TOPICS: Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: trumpcruzchicago; vanity; yes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-443 next last
To: Luke21

True that. But if Trump voters abandoned Trump everytime he said something stupid we wouldn’t be posting on this thread because he’d have no supporters left.


81 posted on 03/12/2016 10:54:02 AM PST by big'ol_freeper (Trump: "Planned Parenthood does wonderful things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Very disappointing.

I was going to vote for him, but now will not.

He had a tremendous opportunity and came off like a hack.

Lawyers are taught to argue and that is what they do.

Leaders unify.


82 posted on 03/12/2016 10:54:20 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Lots of GOPe machine folks still post here, so don’t waste your breath on people who refuse to see what is right in front of their eyes.

They have an agenda and reason won’t work. It’s all good, though. After Trump wins, the party hacks are put out to pasture.


83 posted on 03/12/2016 10:54:28 AM PST by mabelkitty (Trump 2016! Mabelkitty - Unengaged and Low Information Voter since 2000!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Nope. Just donated more $.


84 posted on 03/12/2016 10:54:43 AM PST by Iowa David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine; SuzyQue; Nateman
Cruz is making a “Yes but”, defense.

Cruz is saying

Yes what was done was wrong BUT it is justified because the victim...

Anyone NOT welded at the hip to a candidate knows that is exactly what this is and will hold Cruz accountable

There was such an opportunity here for Cruz and he totally blew it.

Can you imagine what the result would of been if Cruz had come out and supported Trump and soundly castigated the media and the rioters? If he had made a full throated defense of the Constitutional principals of Free Speech and Free Assembly?

But instead he weaseled.

Take a look around the web, you can lie to yourselves all you wish, you will see the truth Tuesday. Cruz made a major error here.

85 posted on 03/12/2016 10:54:50 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I still support Cruz since Trump has encouraged his supporters to be violent towards protestors. This is well documented.

Trump is absolutely not responsible for MoveOn and other leftist thugs and their violence and hatred in Chicago.

My lack of support for Trump is because I don't believe he is for a smaller federal government. How does he plan to force US companies to return jobs to America- with more government?

86 posted on 03/12/2016 10:55:00 AM PST by austingirl (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

And if Trump had shot one of them you all would probably think he was justified. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid and kiss the country good-bye.


87 posted on 03/12/2016 10:55:01 AM PST by Mac n Jac (www.vetsfightingms.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: Spunky

Trump has insulted every single republican candidate.

Even pathological Carson, Christie and now Kaisch.

He also has freepers attacking freepers and even some freepers willing to vote for Hillary.

Will still vote for cruz/trump/cruz. But man, this is a mess.


89 posted on 03/12/2016 10:55:43 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kin Jung mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I used to be a Cruz/Trump supporter. While my concerns regarding Teddy Cruz started already earlier, this was the last straw. It revealed that Cruz is not at all smart and leans left.


90 posted on 03/12/2016 10:55:50 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

What recently switched me over to Trump is when Cruz proved he is a Bush family lackie.


91 posted on 03/12/2016 10:55:51 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Yes! I will never vote for any of the stooges. They all took cheap shots.
Hillary? Cruz? Rubio? Kasich? Dems? GOPe?
Principles?



92 posted on 03/12/2016 10:56:14 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

Some facts of Chicago:

The area’s recorded history begins with the arrival of French explorers, missionaries and fur traders in the late 17th century and their interaction with the local Potawatomi Indians. There were small settlements and a U.S. Army fort, but the soldiers and settlers were all driven off in 1812.

The Cook County suburbs grew rapidly after 1945, but the Democratic party machine kept both the city and suburbs under control, especially under mayor Richard J. Daley, who was chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party. Deindustrialization after 1970 closed the stockyards and most of the steel mills and factories, but the city retained its role as a financial and transportation hub. Increasingly it emphasized its service roles in medicine, higher education and tourism. The city formed the political base for national leaders of the Democratic Party, especially Stephen A. Douglas in the 1850s, Adlai Stevenson in the 1950s, and Barack Obama in recent years.

Emanuel and Clinton, who grew up in a nearby Chicago suburb, have reportedly had their differences over the years. Clinton played a key role in Emanuel’s demotion during his time in the Clinton White House. And early in President Obama’s time in office, Emanuel, then serving as the president’s chief of staff, was the one to tell Clinton she couldn’t hire Sidney Blumenthal, her longtime political confidante, as an aide at the State Department.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders rolled out campaign ads in Illinois this week that are sharply critical of Chicago mayor — and longtime Clinton ally — Rahm Emanuel.

Emanuel was a top official in former President Bill Clinton’s administration and also served as President Barack Obama’s first chief of staff. In 2014, Emanuel announced his support for what was then a potential presidential campaign by Hillary Clinton.

In December, Sanders said he does not care about winning Emanuel’s support in his bid to become the presidential nominee.

“If the question is do I want or need Rahm Emanuel’s support for president, with all due respect to the mayor, no, I don’t,” Sanders said then.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/03/11/far-left-anarchists-with-moveon-org-and-bernie-sanders-take-credit-for-chicago-political-mayhem/#comments

St. Valentine’s Day Massacre

Gang warfare ruled the streets of Chicago during the late 1920s, as chief gangster Al Capone sought to consolidate control by eliminating his rivals in the illegal trades of bootlegging, gambling and prostitution. This rash of gang violence reached its bloody climax in a garage on the city’s North Side on February 14, 1929, when seven men associated with the Irish gangster George “Bugs” Moran, one of Capone’s longtime enemies, were shot to death by several men dressed as policemen. The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre, as it was known, was never officially linked to Capone, but he was generally considered to have been responsible for the murders.

So you can see what a ‘hot bed’ of politics are being played here in Chicago, and the name that Chicago supports...it’s no wonder that there was such an ‘outbreak’ last night, both Sanders and Clinton knows if Trump gets a strong hold in this city, they would be knocked out of the running, and they couldn’t possibly have that..

And then there is Ted Cruz now being hugged by the Bush Clinton Crime Familys:

http://www.hughhewitt.com/ted-cruz-says-candidates-bear-responsibility-culture-campaigns/

You can now see how all this works together, hand in hand, glove to glove...


93 posted on 03/12/2016 10:56:19 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

He’s proven himself to be uniparty - teaming up with the marxists, muslims and black racists on the left when politically expedient.

I used to say I am for Trump, but if he loses I hope Cruz wins. No more. Ted is over the top creepy.


94 posted on 03/12/2016 10:56:27 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx
You trying to stir up a hornets nest? Lol, I think we've done that in spades.

OTOH, it's worth wondering if a President Trump will blame everything on Obama his first couple of years, turnabout is fair play.

95 posted on 03/12/2016 10:57:33 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

Oh that’s no big deal.
He’s just the finance guy!!!
Seriously people Cruise is the new Bush.
I supported Ted financially last year. I switched over late last year and went all in for Trump through January.
But Ted’s behavior in the last few weeks has really validated my decision to leave him in the dust. No more Cruz.
No more Kasich.
No more Rubio...
none of those losers.
Trump is now the solid first choice.


96 posted on 03/12/2016 10:57:45 AM PST by MIA_eccl1212 (When you see a drowning liberal, throw them the anchor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister

I can’t see Ted taking but two or three more states: he will soon run out of states. This is causing him to go bonkers. If he could turn back the clock to Jan. 25, he might have stood a slim chance.


97 posted on 03/12/2016 10:59:13 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: heights

You had to know that one of Cruz’s “The stabbing would never stop.” drones would show up to defend the rhetoric that defines their candidate.


98 posted on 03/12/2016 10:59:14 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I still support Cruz.


99 posted on 03/12/2016 10:59:35 AM PST by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I actually voted for Cruz in the Texas primary although I’ve always preferred Trump’s moxie.

Too bad he carried the state, he’s now been thoroughly corrupted by the GOPe since he’s seen as the only alternative to Trump.


100 posted on 03/12/2016 10:59:50 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-443 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson