Since Yasser Arafat, father of modern terrorism, won the Nobel Peace prize in 1994 the award has become politicized to the point of irrelevancy. Arguably the most unqualified president elected in American history, the community organizer, adjunct professor of law, and senator from Illinois received the Nobel Peace Prize just 9 months after being in office having accomplished nothing. The question begs, why now is the Nobel Committee suffering from "Buyer's Remorse"? What agenda has he not accomplished that had hoped?
The Nobel Committee must have hoped that the socialistic Chrislamic American President was going to usher in an age of Islamic-Christian social brotherhood with the homophilic western world (Jews excluded). They must have thought that the "pro-abortion", "pro-sodomy", "anti-christian", "pro-muslim", "anti-constitution", and "anti-semitic" president was the one to realize this. What has Barack Hussein Obama done in reality? He has destabilized the tenuous middle east order and destroyed its Christianity. He has built ISIS (or ISIL as he calls it) from the ground up with its new title of most dangerous terror organization in the world. He has created a refugee crises bringing millions of Islamists to roost in Europe, and through his push for open borders he has weakened all the nations of the world. Perhaps the Nobel Committee sees now that their mistake may result in the change their award from "Nobel" to "Mohammed Prize", because this is Europe's bold new future...thanks to Obama...
Mark 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
To: Jan_Sobieski
The Norwegian historian told AP that the committee "thought it would strengthen Obama... WTF?
2 posted on
09/17/2015 1:43:06 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: Jan_Sobieski
4 posted on
09/17/2015 1:44:36 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Jan_Sobieski
the panel had expected the award to somewhat challenge Obama, who received the Nobel Peace Prize during his first term. So it's given for what the committee hopes you'll do rather than for what has been done. A narcissist would probably see the prize as his due just for being such a fantastic human being.
5 posted on
09/17/2015 1:45:03 PM PDT by
pa_dweller
(But 'twould be an ill world for weaponless dreamers if evil men were not now and then slain - JRK)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Dammit, when we bought Obama we expected to get our money’s worth!
6 posted on
09/17/2015 1:46:45 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Ex-Nobel committee exec regrets Obama Peace Prize [Buyer's Remorse] Moron's Remorse..like everything else in his life, the Nobel Prize was given to him because of the color of his skin..
7 posted on
09/17/2015 1:47:18 PM PDT by
BerniesFriend
(I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
To: Jan_Sobieski

"...STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES"
8 posted on
09/17/2015 1:48:45 PM PDT by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Jan_Sobieski
Obama well deserves this prize. He's made it his life's mission to be just like the award.

9 posted on
09/17/2015 1:48:55 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: Jan_Sobieski
I would argue that it is a “liberal panderer’s remorse”, in that the Peace Prize committee was dominated by the left to far left of Norway’s political parties. Like the skin-color voters in 2008, it was a near irresistible desire demonstrate one’s progressive fellowship to Obama as he became the second black President although the first one that would convince a camera.
11 posted on
09/17/2015 1:50:01 PM PDT by
SES1066
(Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
To: Jan_Sobieski
So it’s a tool not a prize then? They give it expecting to manipulate outcomes.
13 posted on
09/17/2015 1:51:25 PM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
To: Jan_Sobieski
And to complete the charade of the Nobel Prizes how about that absolute idiot Al Gore?
14 posted on
09/17/2015 1:51:44 PM PDT by
ProudFossil
(" I never did give anyone hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell." Harry Truman)
To: Jan_Sobieski
I’ve met Lundestad. FWIW, he has about eight fingers total (approximately, I didn’t want to stare). The story is that he lost a few in a power tool accident.
15 posted on
09/17/2015 1:56:48 PM PDT by
Dagnabitt
(Islamic Immigration is Treason)
To: Jan_Sobieski
That is what happens when you give an award prospectively.
18 posted on
09/17/2015 2:01:53 PM PDT by
Gamecock
(Many Atheists: "There is no God and I hate Him!")
To: Jan_Sobieski
the only reason they are regretting as they have trashed out this used-to-be prestigious award
20 posted on
09/17/2015 2:03:26 PM PDT by
bestintxas
(every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
An army of opponents noted that Obama had made no foreign policy achievements worthy of the prize in less than nine months in office. Yet Dubya was excoriated endlessly because 9/11 happened nine months into his first term.
Progressive hypocrites are alike all over the world.
21 posted on
09/17/2015 2:14:01 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)
To: Jan_Sobieski
OK, so the Noble “prize” isn’t an award so much as it is an incentive.
Uff da!
So much their credibility .....
22 posted on
09/17/2015 2:29:19 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
24 posted on
09/17/2015 3:32:38 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Ex-Nobel committee exec regrets Obama Peace Prize [Buyer's Remorse] So the satisfaction of flipping off George Bush has lost its luster?
To: Jan_Sobieski
Gee, I wonder why they might regret giving the Nobel Peace Prize to a person who had done absolutely nothing at all to earn it. It’s obvious that he got the prize because he was black and at the time it seemed the appropriate thing to do, even though he had done nothing to earn it. What this in fact did was show that the Nobel Peace Prize was an absolute nothing. Since then, it is viewed as a joke.
To: Jan_Sobieski
I reckon most people don't care by now, because nominating Obozo as a candidate for this "award" within a couple weeks of his inauguration, before he had even done anything, forever cheapened the Nobel Peace Prize beyond recovery.
That everything Obozo has done has been a complete disaster built on a cascade of lies only further diminishes the Nobel Committee's judgement.
30 posted on
09/18/2015 3:57:45 AM PDT by
Amagi
(Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson