Posted on 09/17/2015 1:40:04 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Former Secretary of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee Geir Lundestad reportedly notes in his new book that the body didn't achieve what it had hoped for when it gave Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt and conferred the prestigious award on him in 2009. While it is quite rare for Nobel officials to openly discuss the nuts and bolts of their secretive committee, the former director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute has apparently owned up in his memoir Secretary of Peace, to be released on Thursday, that the panel had expected the award to somewhat challenge Obama, who received the Nobel Peace Prize during his first term.
The Norwegian historian told AP that the committee "thought it would strengthen Obama and it didn't have this effect." The five members of the Nobel Committee, often former politicians, are appointed by the Norwegian parliament. The coveted award was met with an avalanche of criticism instead. An army of opponents noted that Obama had made no foreign policy achievements worthy of the prize in less than nine months in office. On top of this, he received the award while the US was engaged in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan...
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
Yet Dubya was excoriated endlessly because 9/11 happened nine months into his first term.
Progressive hypocrites are alike all over the world.
OK, so the Noble “prize” isn’t an award so much as it is an incentive.
Uff da!
So much their credibility .....
Love your picture!
A Big Freaking “DUH”!!
More like they expected to get their commie’s worth. Obama has failed to be as big Marxist as they hoped for.
What....fingers or brains?
So the satisfaction of flipping off George Bush has lost its luster?
Gee, I wonder why they might regret giving the Nobel Peace Prize to a person who had done absolutely nothing at all to earn it. It’s obvious that he got the prize because he was black and at the time it seemed the appropriate thing to do, even though he had done nothing to earn it. What this in fact did was show that the Nobel Peace Prize was an absolute nothing. Since then, it is viewed as a joke.
- Article 1 Section 9:
- No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state
Take that seriously, and it requires an act of Congress for a president to be entitled to accept a Nobel Peace Prize. Or for the Clinton Foundation to accept donations from foreign governments while she was Sec of State. Or for her husband to accept payment for a speech to foreign officials while his wife was Sec of State.
I will go further and state that it is questionable whether a retired POTUS, with a government pension, should do so. Even if Im not sure it doesnt gore Ronald Reagans ox to say so (in retirement, he gave a speech in Japan for serious money).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.