The Open Letter (to Rainbow-y Relatives and Friends) That Demands a Response

self | 6/28/15 | NewJerseyJoe

[NewJerseyJoe]

Woo-hoo, yay, hurrah. The Supreme Court now says yes to homosexual “marriage.” Today, you’re all doing limp-wristed high-fives and toasting each other with your tall half-caff soy lattes. But, as usual, you don’t see the big picture.

Keeping in line with your propensity for not thinking things through, you’ve neglected to consider something very important—something that will affect the lives of people you claim to love.

Let’s get two facts out of the way first.

1. There is no such thing as homosexual “marriage.” There never will be; there never can be. You can buy judges to rewrite the dictionary as often as you like, but it changes nothing.

2. The homosexual “marriage” push has never been about “marriage.” The percentage of homosexuals is tiny, and the number of those who will “marry” even smaller. It is and has always been a front, a weapon to attack and destroy Christian belief on a massive scale. Several centuries ago, King Henry VIII decided to pervert the definition of marriage; he and his murderous associates followed up by using it as an excuse to kill people and take their stuff. That’s the same plan now. The homosexuals are not the victors in this struggle; they’re the pawns.

Okay, you got that so far? I’m not asking if you agree—I know you don’t—I just want to ensure you’ve read it and understand my point of view before I continue. So let’s get down to brass tacks.

I and millions like me will never comply with this agenda. Never. I’ll resist it to my last breath, as my Faith compels me to. So that leaves you with one question that you must answer:

What manner of penalty do you dictate for me?

Yes, you read that correctly. This new, “tolerant,” “diverse,” open society that you think has been established will never allow people like me to publicly maintain this point of view. No—they will demand that I be punished or sanctioned in some manner. And you’re going to be required to give your blessing to this retribution.

So what’s it to be? What punishment will you demand for your brother, your uncle, your long-time friend?

• Perhaps I should be heavily fined or taxed. What do you think about that? Take away all of my assets for daring to say something in opposition to the “tolerant” people?

• Or maybe licensure and ostracization is the answer. Maybe I should be forced to seek “permission” to speak out against the things I disagree with and be branded with an identifying mark on my forehead.

• How about depriving me of my ability to have a livelihood or own a home? Perhaps the punishment should be that I am not allowed to hold a job—leaving me to become a bum, living in the gutter or only on the charity of others, or maybe just dying of exposure as the seasons change.

• Disenfranchisement is an option. Take away my right to vote for the things I believe in. After all, you have decided that my right to representation is to be ignored and suppressed, right?

• Of course, simplicity is usually the best answer. Maybe I should just take a bullet to the back of the head. What do you think of that? Governments have been doing that for a long time. It’s easy, quick, and relatively inexpensive. This might be the choice you should make.

This is not hyperbole. It’s not a joke. This is happening. It’s very likely that Obama, his goons, and his leftist followers will even recruit you to be the one who sells me out.

Are you ready for that?

So I ask you again: what manner of penalty do you dictate for me?

Tell me now, so I know where we stand in regard to each other.

[demshateGod]

History has answered that question. You get labeled and your peers decide how to punish you. When they don’t, they get labeled.

[Secret Agent Man]

They want to do all that to anyone who opposes them, and they do not care if it hurts anyone they do or don’t know.

[originalbuckeye]

Some on the Left are already publicly advocating that those who don’t believe in ‘climate change’ should be arrested. This issue cannot be far behind.

[Jim Robinson]

The Nazis found bullets to the head to be too expensive. Herding the Christians to the gas chambers is the socialist/fascist way.

[ransacked]

A very nice post...

[WriteOn]

First you have to identify who “they” are. A nameless they is less than a threat.

[Viennacon]

I made a similar letter against some pretty distant relatives of mine who were proMexican Invasion. I outlined the Obama led conspiracy with big business to import cheap labor, and the cartel plans to set up child sex rings where white children will sit on Mexican laps.Unsurprisingly, they broke off contact, calling me a racist. Shows the argument worked and they had to default to a talking point. See what your response is.

[ConjunctionJunction]

You forgot reeducation camps.

/sarc(?)

[madison10]

Not that it means anything, but anyone with a rainbow avatar gets hidden, deleted, made to go away because I am sick of this homosexual propaganda. Also, “gay” means happy it is NOT their word.

[WXRGina]

Exactly.

[NewJerseyJoe]

I didn’t forget — it was actually one of the first things I thought of. But then I thought: there would have to be so many, and they’d be so big — the leftists would be left with the conundrum “Who’s going to pay his fair share for this?” after having removed all the producers from society.....

[Don Corleone]

History has answered that question. You get labeled and your peers decide how to punish you. When they don’t, they get labeled.

Its all spelled out quite clearly in"1984

Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia!

[gop4lyf]

“Gay Marriage” is neither.

[Honcho Bongs]

“How about depriving me of my ability to have a livelihood ...? Perhaps the punishment should be that I am not allowed to hold a job....”

It’s already happening. It happened to me. Last year I was coerced into leaving a city government job that I had held for many years because I wasn’t sufficiently enthusiastic towards “transgender” and homosexual issues. Upper management at this facility has evolved over the years and is now comprised of people who are either gay or cheerleaders for gay accomodations. Gay employees are over-represented at this facility and hirings and promotions are slanted towards gay applicants and employees.

Despite being scrupulously neutral, neutrality was not enough. They wanted positive participation in the fictions they believe. When it came time for my annual review, I found out that after many years of excellent work and reviews, several people colluded to present a fraudulent narrative of my performance that would lead to my dismissal after a phony probation period administered and evaluated by these same people. I was left with no choice but to resign before my employment record was stained by their lies.

Everyone wants equal rights but there has never been such a thing. Whoever gets the power finds a way to consolidate their power by discriminating against the people they don’t agree with.

[LibsRJerks]

This really expresses a lot for me. I want to say to my many “rainbow” friends .... Because of you, folks like me .... Your family member, your friend .... I will suffer, in some way. At worst, you may witness my persecution and or execution so as to see your dream of so-called equality, come true.

How can I call anyone like this my true friend?

How is it equality for all?

[Tired of Taxes]

Ironic - isn’t it? - that the same people who sued to stop one group from being pushed out of employment are now pushing other people out.

Sorry about what happened to you.

[who knows what evil?]

I couldn't care less how they choose to 'punish' me...it is THEY who are at risk of hellfire.

[NewJerseyJoe]

That is precisely the reason I wrote it. You should forward it to them. And tell them that you’re serious about knowing which of the punishments they would choose for you.

[raybbr]

Thank you for this. It says exactly everything I’ve been thinking.