Posted on 12/30/2013 4:16:26 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
The left-leaning Jewish Daily Forward goes all-in to defend Footie Pajamas Boy, by accusing the right of a centuries-old nexus of anti-Semitism and misogyny. (Link safe; goes to Hot Air. Im not rewarding a Website extra traffic for trolling the Interwebs):
In fact, Pajama Boy stands at a centuries-old nexus of anti-Semitism and misogyny. As scholars including Sander Gilman and Daniel Boyarin have shown, Jewish men have been accused of being unmanly for hundreds of years including by other Jews, such as the early Zionists, whose muscular Judaism was a direct response to diaspora Jewish emasculation. This is an old, old motif.The Jew is the Other is the Effeminate is the Liberal. He is the urbanite, the parasite, the usurer, the lawyer. His effeminacy corrupts the Volk or the Heartland or the real American values. ....
Really, whats metrosexual about Pajama Boy, anyway? The fact that hes wearing pajamas? Drinking a hot beverage? No its the way in which he so perfectly fits the Rights image of the liberal Jewish girly-man. Theres a real masculinity, and then theres whatever it is that Pajama Boy is embodying. .....
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.
No matter how well you play chess,
the pigeon just knocks over the pieces,
craps on the board,
utters unintelligible, vaguely obscene sounds,
and struts around like he won.
I think they intentionally miss the point, that it is not Jews who are seen as weak and to be despised, but weak and unmanly men of whatever stripe.
They even mentioned that “muscular” Zionist Jews despised weak Jewish men; but they didn’t say why. That every Jewish man who went meekly to his death in Nazi Germany made it *easy* for their oppressors. Every one who fought back and resisted in a manly way, took a dozen, or even a hundred Nazis to kill. Had more resisted, it might have even undermined the entire Nazi war effort.
And it can even be said that such strength is not exclusively physical strength, but strength of *character* and *emotional* strength. *Intellectual* strength. Even *spiritual* strength matters.
So what is to admire in a man who is androgynous, weak of body, weak of character, tepid in emotions, dull of mind, and spiritually lacking? Not a whole heck of a lot.
Such people sit around in their pajamas, sip on tea, and parasite from any willing or unwilling donor available. They are mankind’s runny nose.
Not this Jew, I would not cross to street to piss on Chuckie if he was on fire.
I never thought of PJ Boy as a Jew.
I’ve read plenty of comments about PJ Boy on the web, including FR and I never once read where anyone writes that he is Jewish. Until now.
Once again, the left tries to shutdown debate or comments from conservatives or anyone by playing the race card, the sex card, the ethic card or whatever. It gets tiresome.
The “missing of the point” was intentional.
Just like when you criticize “baby mamas” and “generational welfare”, the left will accuse you of racism, not addressing the points of the actual issues of bastardity and dependence.
In this case, we have a smirking arrogant liberal who “dropped the veil” and revealed who they really are,
and they run to the next best thing to the race card,
the “anti-Semitism” card.
Gal Gadot is the next Wonder Woman in the movies.
Also of note: the actor who played Superman in the last movie -— Jewish.
Yeah, we’re such a wimpy people, stupid liberal Mnahattanite faux Jew!
That is most definitely a “keeper!”
He also publicly proclaims he has NO MORALS.
Therefore, he is NOT A JEW.
Please pick up your shredded victimhood card at the front desk. Thank you for your cooperation.
Yeah, we say that all the time about the IDF.
Well observed.
The next ad will have him eating cheeseburgers for OTraumacare.
>> Jewish?! I thought he looked Italian!
I never focused on his ancestry. I just think he looks queer.
The fact that he might be a Heblew never even crossed my mind.
How dare you impugn a Jew of convenience!
Just another case of
“if you point out a deficiency in liberal culture, we’ll associate you with atrocities of the past”.
If you point out the failure of the welfare state or inner city culture that the left promotes,
you want to return to the days of slavery as described by Bashir.
If you point out despicable character aspects of a liberal who happens to have dark curly hair,
you want to put all Jews in concentration camps.
It’s to shame you and shut you up.
It’s exactly what Pajama Boy describes as his “debate” technique.
Using a Jewish “man” in the ad is as intentional as putting forth a “black” candidate for president - it is so they can deflect all criticism by associating critics with historic atrocities.
He looks a lot more like German-American Leonard Hofstadter than Jewish Howard Wolowicz. Just my opinion but add in that it’s a Christmas ad and his Jewishness seems a good deal in doubt.
-ditto-
I knew he was.
sadly, if his mother was Jewish, he’s Jewish. Just a really bad at it.
As an aside, Pajama Boy is in Christmas-looking PJs and has Christmas lights strung in the background.
Pretty odd behavior for a Jewish guy, and certainly there is nothing there to suggest Pajama Boy is Jewish.
In short, the entire basis of the article is wrong.
You're just saying that cause he's not a doctor ;o)
Honest question for you -
is it considered insulting to Jews to make a distinction between Jewish ethnicity and religion?
> Youre right. The comments are good.
Yeah they are. I like this one:
Would someone please explain why so many American Jews work to undermine the foundations Of the only country where Jews are actually safe? Seems culturally suicidal.
“Because they’re not actually Jews.
They’re Marxist athiests with Jewish ancestors.”
: )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.