I think they intentionally miss the point, that it is not Jews who are seen as weak and to be despised, but weak and unmanly men of whatever stripe.
They even mentioned that “muscular” Zionist Jews despised weak Jewish men; but they didn’t say why. That every Jewish man who went meekly to his death in Nazi Germany made it *easy* for their oppressors. Every one who fought back and resisted in a manly way, took a dozen, or even a hundred Nazis to kill. Had more resisted, it might have even undermined the entire Nazi war effort.
And it can even be said that such strength is not exclusively physical strength, but strength of *character* and *emotional* strength. *Intellectual* strength. Even *spiritual* strength matters.
So what is to admire in a man who is androgynous, weak of body, weak of character, tepid in emotions, dull of mind, and spiritually lacking? Not a whole heck of a lot.
Such people sit around in their pajamas, sip on tea, and parasite from any willing or unwilling donor available. They are mankind’s runny nose.
The “missing of the point” was intentional.
Just like when you criticize “baby mamas” and “generational welfare”, the left will accuse you of racism, not addressing the points of the actual issues of bastardity and dependence.
In this case, we have a smirking arrogant liberal who “dropped the veil” and revealed who they really are,
and they run to the next best thing to the race card,
the “anti-Semitism” card.