Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
welcome to free republic troll
For instance, the Alvin T Onaka signature is an embedded black and white, 1 bit colorized bitmap, 76.735 by 1172.87 ppi resolution. The main information block is also the same type of bitmap, but its resolution is 239.802 by 375.31 ppi. The date in box 20 has a resolution of 65.278 by 1378.69 ppi. These different resolutions of objects, supposedly scanned by a single machine at once from a single document, makes me look askance at the claim this is an actual scan.
I'd be interested in finding out if the "debunkers" are able to achieve multiple bitmap resolutions on their Xerox 7655.
I don’t understand the computer stuff so I don’t mess with it too much, but if they started out with a document with halos it seems to me a bit disingenuous that they are ecstatic to come up with a scan that has..... halos. And when they separate out the layers and move them to the side they end up with... layers off to the side. But why would anybody do that? Why would anybody put a clipping mask on it? Why would anybody refuse to let Obama hold the stupid thing, or let the press crew see and videotape it?
There’s actually an easier way to know this is a forgery: the security background doesn’t have one of the features of the security paper the HDOH uses.
And there’s a legal way to find out if the claims on the forgery meet the standards to be prima facia evidence: ask the state registrar to verify those facts. What’s that you say? Ken Bennett already did that? And Onaka refused to verify any of the facts? Well, I guess we’ve got our legal answer then, huh?
I believe at least a couple of them are working with both the HDOH and the White House to disseminate disinformation.
I also wonder if one of them is involved in the IRS targeting of Constitutionalists.
And if the scanner in question is connected to a computer, what’s to say that the computer itself isn’t being run remotely by somebody in the regime, so that it does exactly what the regime operator wants it to do? If hackers can control a car remotely to cause a fatal crash, why couldn’t they get a computer to act like it’s scanning a document and then output the White House PDF? There is a reason these people want the capability to control computers, so it would be silly not to ask what they are doing with that capability. They’ve proven they are dishonest and cunning, so they must think we’re idiots if we would trust them to not use the covert abilities they’ve gathered for themselves.
Likewise, those who boast of having created forgeries to have Orly submit in court are nuts if they think we should trust anything they say at this juncture. They’re self-admitted liars.
As are the “leaders” at the HDOH. Forensic examination of the microfilms and paper documents from multiple months and years, as well as the computer transaction logs and an audit of all the vital records and citizenship records are what is needed, given the deceptions, fabrications, obfuscation, and outright crimes committed by officials at all levels. And Benghazi, IRS-gate, Fast and Furious, Extortion 17, Michael Hastings’ and Andrew Breitbart’s deaths, James Rosen wiretaps, Sharyl Attkisson’s computer hacking, etc are all different verses of the same song. It’s all related. It’s all our government targeting innocent civilians while covering for terrorists and usurpers.
“I’d be interested in finding out if the “debunkers” are able to achieve multiple bitmap resolutions on their Xerox 7655.”
IIRC (my head is spinning from not being an expert in this field and an illness) “NBC” claims that the Xerox automatically scans at multiple different bitmap resolutions that are selected on the fly depending on the characteristics detected in the document as it is scanned.
The main NBC LFBC blog has “MultipleResolutions” as a tag...
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/category/obama-long-form-birth-certificate/
If they’ve got a high-end scanner like that at the White House, then why did they print out a copy of the Snopes COLB for the packets they gave the press? And why did the poor-quality printed-out copy of the Snopes image bleed through from behind a long-form BC that was supposedly on security paper intended specifically to keep such a thing from happening?
Nah, the more they come up with, the more the whole thing stinks.
welcome to free republic troll
Good catch, Stone. No Freeper would post that kind of defense of Obama here.
How many copies would you like to see?
Every member of the Washington Press Corps received copies of the short form and the long form in a press packet when the news event announcing the long form occurred.
That included Les Kinsolving of worldnetdaily.com
Funny! :-)
Building levels of ozone in ones space do tend to make a person laugh inappropriately.
Since June of 2012 Judge Henry T. Wingate of the U.S, District Court in Jackson, Mississippi has had a certified copy of the Obama long form birth certificate and a Letter of Verification from Dr. Onaka provided by Obama’s attorneys in Taitz, et. al. v. Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Commitee, Obama, Pelosi, et. al.
The copy is on page 11 and the Certified Letter of Verification is on page 12 at the following link:
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/96289285
Also the Alabama Supreme Court has a certified copy of the long form and a copy of the Letter of Verification that was submitted by the Alabama Democratic Party in an amicus brief in McInnish v. Chapman. Mike Zullo also submitted an affidavit in that appeal.
Yes, I’ve noticed that.
They actually have three different versions.
That doesn’t explain away the “1” in the filing number being a different font.
Why did the lawyers for the Mississippi Dems need to ellicit legal mumbo-jumbo from Alvin Onaka to get his “verification”? Why didn’t they just ask Onaka to send a new certified copy of the COLB for the court to review? They seem to be taking great pains not to follow normal chain-of-custody procedures and are locked into this one image that was posted online in April 2011. Why? Why couldn’t the President’s lawyers simply request Onaka to personally scan the vault copy on different security paper (like the official paper used by HDOH)? Why couldn’t Obama authorize the National Archives to take possession of the vault copy and bring it to the Library of Congress for public display? He seems to have no issues using executive power to do all kinds of lawless and anti-Constitutional actions. He’s not running for office anymore, so he can’t be obfuscating solely for political advantage can he? Is he that cynical and callous? Doesn’t he owe Terry Lakin (and other political prisoners) the truth?
sfl
“Since June of 2012 Judge Henry T. Wingate of the U.S, District Court in Jackson, Mississippi has had a certified copy of the Obama long form birth certificate and a Letter of Verification from Dr. Onaka provided by Obama’s attorneys in Taitz, et. al. v. Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Commitee, Obama, Pelosi, et. al.”
False.
A “certified copy” was NOT produced for the court.
Read what Onaka actually certifies. He doesn’t certify the WH image as a “true and correct copy,” the standard legal language for a perfect match. He only says that the information in the image “matches” the information in the HI file.
This is clever lawyer mumbo-jumbo leaving open the possibility that amended filings, perhaps years after 1961 were placed in the vital records which to some unspecified extent “match” the WH pdf. The amended filings in bits and pieces could, together, “match” the “information” in the WH pdf.
Nothing has ever been straight-up with Barry’s records, and legal escape hatches are ALWAYS there.
Dr. Onaka’s certification stamp is clearly visible at the bottom of the copy: “I certify this is a true copy...”
What we all view on the Internet is just a digital image reproduction of the hard copy that is in Judge Wingate’s possession.
If Judge Wingate (a Reagan-appointed federal judge) is not happy with the copy in his possession and needs a different copy, he can issue a court order for his very own original hard copy directly from Hawaii Department of Health.
If Judge Wingate doesn’t find the wording of the Onaka Letter of Verification to be convincing or appropriate, he can reject the Motion in Opposition from the Mississippi Democrats, Obama, Pelosi, et. al.
We’ve all been patiently waiting for more than a year now for him to rule one way or the other.
We have photographs of the paper original that were taken by Savannah Guthrie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.