[Sgt_Schultze]

My big problem with this "document" is that it is offered as something that was scanned. Yet when the clipping masks in the layered pdf version are released, there are bitmaps with varied resolutions. If this object were, in fact a single scan, then all objects that might release should be the same resolution, irrespective of their sizes.

For instance, the Alvin T Onaka signature is an embedded black and white, 1 bit colorized bitmap, 76.735 by 1172.87 ppi resolution. The main information block is also the same type of bitmap, but its resolution is 239.802 by 375.31 ppi. The date in box 20 has a resolution of 65.278 by 1378.69 ppi. These different resolutions of objects, supposedly scanned by a single machine at once from a single document, makes me look askance at the claim this is an actual scan.

I'd be interested in finding out if the "debunkers" are able to achieve multiple bitmap resolutions on their Xerox 7655.

[Seizethecarp]

“I’d be interested in finding out if the “debunkers” are able to achieve multiple bitmap resolutions on their Xerox 7655.”

IIRC (my head is spinning from not being an expert in this field and an illness) “NBC” claims that the Xerox automatically scans at multiple different bitmap resolutions that are selected on the fly depending on the characteristics detected in the document as it is scanned.

The main NBC LFBC blog has “MultipleResolutions” as a tag...

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/category/obama-long-form-birth-certificate/