Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Mitt Romney Balance the Budget?
June 29 2012 | Clay Taurus

Posted on 06/29/2012 2:36:01 PM PDT by Clay Taurus

As fiscal conservatives we have morally and correctly attacked Obama on the record deficits that have now surpassed George W Bush’s record deficits of the time. Will a Present Mitt Romney balance the budget? And if he doesn’t, should we remain quite?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: deficit; dnctroll; dutroll; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2012 2:36:09 PM PDT by Clay Taurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

No, Mittens won’t balance the budget. His big idea is to pay for tax cuts by “closing loopholes” in things like deductions for state property taxes. His “reforms” are just surface level that don’t tackle the real money black holes, such as social security, medicare, medicaid, etc. He is also vowing to increase defense spending, which I am not opposed to, but there is no math in any of his plans which even match what he is promising to do. He gives little specifics, and his promises ring hollow.

A Ron Paul could do it. A Herman Cain could do it. A Newt Gingrich could do it. Mitt Romney? Definitely not.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 2:41:17 PM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

It is constitutionally impossible for the President alone to balance the federal budget. Since FDR our Presidents have been assigned more and more authoritarian qualities to the point that I fear most people think the President can legally snap his fingers, sign an executive order and do anything he wishes.

That is the overwhelming case among blacks regarding Hussein.


3 posted on 06/29/2012 2:44:11 PM PDT by Jacquerie (The American Revolution is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Quite what?


4 posted on 06/29/2012 2:50:32 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Which of our past US Presidents balanced the budget?


5 posted on 06/29/2012 2:53:42 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Yes.

President Romney and Republican Congress must balance the federal budget.


6 posted on 06/29/2012 3:02:42 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Bush didn’t balance the budget but that was OK because he was a conservative. /sarc


7 posted on 06/29/2012 3:13:10 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

A balanced budget in year one?

How about we allow him to start by spending less money on special interest wish-lists. Our goal should be to cut spending in REAL terms in the face of loud opposition from the Dems and the media.

I am so tired of so-called “cuts” to hypothetical budgets that, in reality, still INCREASE government spending.


8 posted on 06/29/2012 3:15:13 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

No, he won’t. Hopefully he will reduce the deficit some.

Our budget deficit is so large, if it can be balanced at all, it will take several presidential terms to do it.


9 posted on 06/29/2012 3:16:04 PM PDT by upchuck (FACEBOOK... Share pointless stuff with friends you don't know. Beg for intrusion into your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

The federal budget was balanced every year from 1920 to 1930 thanks to the fiscal conservatism of Harding/Coolidge and Republican Congress. The national debt was reduced from $26 Billion on 1 July 1920 to $16.2 Billion on 1 July 1930

But the “offical” liberal historians have portrayed Harding and Coolidge as evil Republiccan capitalists.


10 posted on 06/29/2012 3:19:18 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Presidents don’t balance budgets. Congress does. He can only sign a balanced budget they present to him.


11 posted on 06/29/2012 3:40:11 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ("I'm comfortable with a Romney win." - Pres. Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus
Will Mitt Romney Balance the Budget?


12 posted on 06/29/2012 3:49:27 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

should we remain quite
_____________________________

WHAT?


13 posted on 06/29/2012 4:55:04 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

Well, since he raised fees on everything and taxes while Governor of MA to the tuneof $700 million, don’t count on it.

He certainly will not decrease the size of government, he will certainly, given his established record, increase the size of government.


14 posted on 06/29/2012 5:22:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clay Taurus

He’ll cut the only program the beneficiaries paid for - social security. This will make the libertarian hearts leap.


15 posted on 06/29/2012 5:38:01 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

And the real problem is boldly stated. Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die. Until everybody agrees to give back their own handouts nothing will be done. Yes SS is a handout a few years after retirement. Most people get back what they paid in very quickly, the next 15 years of retirement is handouts. Nothing turns a tea partier into a statist more than advocating cutting their Social Security and Medicaire. Since these two make up a huge percentage of Federal outlays, everything else is sophistry. We have met the enemy and the enemy is us.


16 posted on 06/29/2012 5:45:50 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Give me back the money you collected for my retirement and health care and we’ll call it a deal. I’m not retired yet but don’t intend to take it in the shorts from some idiot libertarian with no sense of right and wrong.

Cut all the crap that does not belong in government and all the benefits paid to people of the US and world who did not pay for them, then talk to me about the wisdom of stealing my retirement money.


17 posted on 06/29/2012 8:08:40 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Fine, you will receive everything you paid in by your 70th birthday, then after that it is those still working’s money you are receiving, not yours. The dirty little secret is that Rick Perry was right.


18 posted on 06/30/2012 3:55:13 AM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Bull.


19 posted on 06/30/2012 7:31:31 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

And thus we shall go bankrupt. Greece here we come, and it will be the people’s own fault, no one else.


20 posted on 06/30/2012 11:28:40 AM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson