Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2012 2:36:09 PM PDT by Clay Taurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Clay Taurus

No, Mittens won’t balance the budget. His big idea is to pay for tax cuts by “closing loopholes” in things like deductions for state property taxes. His “reforms” are just surface level that don’t tackle the real money black holes, such as social security, medicare, medicaid, etc. He is also vowing to increase defense spending, which I am not opposed to, but there is no math in any of his plans which even match what he is promising to do. He gives little specifics, and his promises ring hollow.

A Ron Paul could do it. A Herman Cain could do it. A Newt Gingrich could do it. Mitt Romney? Definitely not.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 2:41:17 PM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

It is constitutionally impossible for the President alone to balance the federal budget. Since FDR our Presidents have been assigned more and more authoritarian qualities to the point that I fear most people think the President can legally snap his fingers, sign an executive order and do anything he wishes.

That is the overwhelming case among blacks regarding Hussein.


3 posted on 06/29/2012 2:44:11 PM PDT by Jacquerie (The American Revolution is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Quite what?


4 posted on 06/29/2012 2:50:32 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Which of our past US Presidents balanced the budget?


5 posted on 06/29/2012 2:53:42 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Yes.

President Romney and Republican Congress must balance the federal budget.


6 posted on 06/29/2012 3:02:42 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Bush didn’t balance the budget but that was OK because he was a conservative. /sarc


7 posted on 06/29/2012 3:13:10 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

A balanced budget in year one?

How about we allow him to start by spending less money on special interest wish-lists. Our goal should be to cut spending in REAL terms in the face of loud opposition from the Dems and the media.

I am so tired of so-called “cuts” to hypothetical budgets that, in reality, still INCREASE government spending.


8 posted on 06/29/2012 3:15:13 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

No, he won’t. Hopefully he will reduce the deficit some.

Our budget deficit is so large, if it can be balanced at all, it will take several presidential terms to do it.


9 posted on 06/29/2012 3:16:04 PM PDT by upchuck (FACEBOOK... Share pointless stuff with friends you don't know. Beg for intrusion into your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Presidents don’t balance budgets. Congress does. He can only sign a balanced budget they present to him.


11 posted on 06/29/2012 3:40:11 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ("I'm comfortable with a Romney win." - Pres. Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus
Will Mitt Romney Balance the Budget?


12 posted on 06/29/2012 3:49:27 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

should we remain quite
_____________________________

WHAT?


13 posted on 06/29/2012 4:55:04 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

Well, since he raised fees on everything and taxes while Governor of MA to the tuneof $700 million, don’t count on it.

He certainly will not decrease the size of government, he will certainly, given his established record, increase the size of government.


14 posted on 06/29/2012 5:22:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Taurus

He’ll cut the only program the beneficiaries paid for - social security. This will make the libertarian hearts leap.


15 posted on 06/29/2012 5:38:01 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson