Posted on 07/18/2011 4:28:59 AM PDT by RobinMasters
NEW YORK – Unless the typewriter used to type Barack Obama's purported Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" in 1961 was magically capable of producing different size and shaped images with the exact same key, the document released by the White House April 27 is a forgery, says a professional typographer with 50 years experience.
"Steel-stamped letters do not expand to larger sizes and morph into different styles of type," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND.
As WND previously reported, it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter, according to Irey.
"These are irrefutable proofs of forgery," he said.
His newest analysis suggests the document was assembled from images of letters or words taken from other documents.
"The forger who produced the Obama Hawaii long-form birth certificate may have thought that all typewriter typeface styles were alike," he said.
"To get his letters, the forger must have understood that he needed to copy the old typewriter styles," he continued. "So the forger probably scanned a bunch of old birth certificates, without realizing that the letters in the old files were from different typewriter styles. That's why the letters in the forged document do not match each other."
Irey used as a source document the Xerox copy of the Obama birth certificate the White House press staff handed to the press assembled in the White House pressroom on April 27, as seen in Exhibit 1:
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
That is a great point!
I only have to answer one question:ML/NJ“Do you think the long form birth certificate released a few months ago is legitimate or do you think it’s a fraud. If you think it’s fake, why do you think that?”
It’s a fraud.
Computers are my business. I’ve been working with pixels for more than 30 years. If one looks at the wh.gov pdf image of the proffered BC, and enlarges the area (6x or 600% will do) where the Dunham and Sinclair signatures are, he will see that some parts of the signatures are “big” pixels and some are “little” pixels. This simply doesn’t happen on a single scan of a single document, WH BS notwithstanding. (And BTW, it didn’t happen with the lawyer letter pdf’s released at the same time by the WH.)
Since I first discovered this, multiple credentialed experts have come forward to declare the document a fraud. One is an author whose Adobe Photoshop book I’ve had on my shelves for more than five years now. Another is typewriter forensics expert who points out ludicrous differences between letters supposedly typed on the BC with the same machine.
And then there are the just regular folks who point out smiley faces and “THE” misspelled (as “TXE”) in the official ink stamp.
The document is such an obvious fraud that it had to be produced as an obvious fraud, either by Obama to taunt, or by an underling who knew what he was being asked to do was wrong and wanted it discovered.
A gentlemanly discussion leading to a gentlemanly conclusion. Thanks. (And if you’re a lady, just swap the words.)
Excellent observation!
The issue is dead.
///
i was avidly reading Satindoll, Butterdezillion, and others, long before i actually signed up here.
who died and make you the “Czar” on this issue?
...and, i have noticed that on many other totally unrelated issues, you have very interesting “conservative” positions.
“i was avidly reading Satindoll, Butterdezillion, and others, long before i actually signed up here.”
Those are two posters I like to read as well. :0)
Like your about page.
“It’s Dead!” is a lot easier answer and much quicker. That way people don’t have to care and can get back to Idol or Sports.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.