That is a great point!
I only have to answer one question:ML/NJDo you think the long form birth certificate released a few months ago is legitimate or do you think its a fraud. If you think its fake, why do you think that?
Its a fraud.
Computers are my business. Ive been working with pixels for more than 30 years. If one looks at the wh.gov pdf image of the proffered BC, and enlarges the area (6x or 600% will do) where the Dunham and Sinclair signatures are, he will see that some parts of the signatures are big pixels and some are little pixels. This simply doesnt happen on a single scan of a single document, WH BS notwithstanding. (And BTW, it didnt happen with the lawyer letter pdfs released at the same time by the WH.)
Since I first discovered this, multiple credentialed experts have come forward to declare the document a fraud. One is an author whose Adobe Photoshop book Ive had on my shelves for more than five years now. Another is typewriter forensics expert who points out ludicrous differences between letters supposedly typed on the BC with the same machine.
And then there are the just regular folks who point out smiley faces and THE misspelled (as TXE) in the official ink stamp.
The document is such an obvious fraud that it had to be produced as an obvious fraud, either by Obama to taunt, or by an underling who knew what he was being asked to do was wrong and wanted it discovered.
Excellent observation!