"Bon Appetit Birth Certificate…"
Leo speaks out.
He's still stalling, and this ain't going away, UNLESS The Donald concedes, in which case he is nothing more than a stalking-horse for Hussein, meant to inoculate him from further birth certificate inquiries.
Has anyone told Leo that this is NOT the LF/BC but a more thorough COLB as has been released before?
I’m not sure whether Leo has a case. Other things I’ve read have made me think not. But it’s worth looking at.
Yes I’ve been saying for a while that the “certificaters” are mostly Soros plants trying to divert everyone from the British father. Same for those trying to make the states require a BC. I guess it’s better that the usurper sprung his trap earlier than later. Plus it gives us time to prove the fake.
Okay, I can see that there’s not so much an interest in actual truth on the part of some here as there is on furthering their talking points as a form of propaganda - even after they’ve been demonstrated to be either false (as in the claim that there’s “nothing new” on the birth certificate released today), or entirely irrelevant (as in making a big deal of there being no embossed seal on the certificate released today, when what we have instead to testify to its authenticity is a personal letter from the Director of the Health Department for the State of Hawaii).
I therefore yield the floor to those who are simply interested in putting forth their propaganda, the actual demonstrable truth be d*mned.
Thanks for the link.
Intuition tells one that O was forced into releasing this document prematurely.
O would have received substantially more political benefit had he intervened prior to Dr. Lakin’s court martial and formally produced this BC. O could have posed as a responsible CinC and a larger portion of the public would have swooned.
This may be a rushed attempt to occupy center of the board prior to publication of Jerome Corsi’s book. O may have had folks following Jerome Corsi’s investigators and now be expecting the release of additional substantial questions..
In any event, to the extent Trump and O may have removed the BC issue, then the greater the amount of focus will be on the inseparable “two citizen parent” element of NBC.
Nothing will happen, of course, until we find a sufficent number of courageous politicians in the House and the argument is presented to the USSC.
Leo is making assertions, not logical deductions. Why did Obama hide it all this time if it says nothing new? I don’t follow Leo’s “logic” that some sort of precedent has been set.
I heard on the radio today that zero released the long form for the Pope and all to see... and that since HI has a hard and fast law that no one, not even TOTUS, can have their long form to have and to hold, only view it, purple lips had to use his outside law firm (and his own "Dear Hawaii" request on WH letterhead) to request HI officials release a copy of the long form to him so he may show it and he could get back to the real issues at hand (vacations and golf). And of course, HI complied.
Anyway, I know for a fact that I, along with multiple Freepers, went to the gov of Hi website and cut and pasted their own regulation for (and I am trying to recall here) the presentation of only the long form when applying for land ownership????? (It had something to do with registering as a land owner, if not exactly that). I am paraphrasing, but I recall the site stating something to the effect of "you must present the LF...short forms will not be acceptable proof when applying for land ownership". Sorry...again, exhausted, but that is bothering me.
Why is it I am hearing now that no one, God included, can get a long form BC from HI, yet it was required to register as a land owner in a current 2008 regulation posted on their own government website?
When was the law "conveniently" changed that none shall have?