Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Thanks for the link.

Intuition tells one that O was forced into releasing this document prematurely.

O would have received substantially more political benefit had he intervened prior to Dr. Lakin’s court martial and formally produced this BC. O could have posed as a responsible CinC and a larger portion of the public would have swooned.

This may be a rushed attempt to occupy center of the board prior to publication of Jerome Corsi’s book. O may have had folks following Jerome Corsi’s investigators and now be expecting the release of additional substantial questions..

In any event, to the extent Trump and O may have removed the BC issue, then the greater the amount of focus will be on the inseparable “two citizen parent” element of NBC.

Nothing will happen, of course, until we find a sufficent number of courageous politicians in the House and the argument is presented to the USSC.


11 posted on 04/27/2011 10:37:44 AM PDT by frog in a pot (There is an important reason U.S. birth certificate forms designate the birthplace of the parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

Barak Hussein Obama II was NOT born with the name Barak Hussein Obama II. Where is the document continuity that shows which baby born on Obama’s birthday is actually the same guy who is occupying the White House? In 1961, how would the person creating the original birth certificate know that the baby would eventually be legally know as Barak Hussein Obama II?


20 posted on 04/27/2011 12:39:03 PM PDT by Vic Blitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson