Posted on 02/22/2011 10:46:07 AM PST by rxsid
"Dr. Ronald Polland: Obama's Two Minute Warning; Factcheck.org Forged Obama's Birth Certificate
Game over, Barack Obama. This 2-minute video will destroy your birth certificate fraud.
You were not born here. You are not a US citizen. Your FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, fabricated by Annenberg Factcheck, proves you are a liar, a fraud, an imposter, and an illegal alien.
The FIRST EIGHT SECONDS of this video buries your rabid liberal media in their own lies.
They demanded that conservatives accept what the Hawaii Governor said about you and your birth certificate.
We do - now you and your gullible supporters must do likewise.
The former Governor said that requesting a Presidential candidate to show his or her birth certificate to prove eligibility is a legitimate question for Congress.
Mr. Obama - or whatever your is real name - you had seven years to prove who you are, and you refused to do so.
Obama must go, NOW. - Dr. Ronald Polland - Source.
YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTgAuVFo7iU&feature=player_embedded"
From: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/dr-ronald-polland-obamas-two-minute.html
Flashback from the Right Side of Life; - Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's. -
The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.
Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.
FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more here.
And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more here and here.
She is speaking for Onaka, its heresay.
......have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.......
So they have his original BC, that must not be a long form you said they destroyed them in 2001 and you cant get a copy..Right? So what exactly do they have and what does it say? What state policy and procedures are they talking about, the ones for witnessed births,hospital births, or those claiming Hawaiian birth based on past residency not location? What does date filed and date accepted mean?
Dr. Onaka can provide expert testimony, eyewitness testimony and corroborating testimony. He can address any and all of the questions you have posed to a congressional committee, to a grand jury, to a civil court judge, to a criminal court judge and to a jury.
Little Jameseeeee7777777 is a willy nilly OBot poster. A script right out of Chicago would not be a surprise.
It seems that jamese777 cannot read. It was 0bama that stated he was born at Queens, not the newspaper.
lol, I’m not sure what the picture of Queen Kapiolani has to do with it.
I'm always grateful to see people taking steps to try to get more attention paid to the eligibility and birth certificate issues.
Please consider indulging me a word of caution on pointing others to the content of this particular video. In my opinion, Polland's (Polarik's) arguments tend to be based on some of the murkiest and least compelling points of "evidence." I don't mean to dismiss his work. I don't even consider my self as having patiently waded through all the tedious fine details that Polarik draws upon in sufficient fashion to render a final conclusion.
Still, this particular video leaves questions in my mind about things like whether the incriminating shadows may be emphasized as a result of some image filter applied or, as other have said, compression artifacts that arise in some image formats or any of other unknown combinations of intervening peculiarities that could have been a part of the imaging technologies used to give us these images.
My main point is that in general the media has been unwilling to carefully evaluate the "low-hanging fruit" with regard to doubts about the Birth Certificate, so it's hard for me to imagine that many in the media will be straining through hours of intense study on digital imaging analysis to find a deeply hidden or esoteric nugget of truth that is damning to Obama's birth narrative assertions.
If anything I can't help but wonder if the typical journalist wouldn't respond to this by thinking, "What? Is this the best argument the birthers have? There's probably not much to this. And yet this arrogant Polland guy acts like impeachment is merely a formality once we see his work?" I think there are a number of much more obvious, much more compelling arguments that are easy picking and should take precedence over Polland's work, although I really don't want to spit upon all the work he has done for a cause that I deeply believe in.
For what I regard as the more obvious, less technocentric arguments, if you haven't already, please take a look at Mario Apuzzo's excellent Catalog of Evidence which references document forensics as a relatively small part of a long lost list of arguments. Also, I have benefited from and recommend reading stuff from The Western Center For Journalism, Alan Keyes, Leo Donofrio, Butterdezillion, Danae and Jack Cashill on this.
At the end of the day, if this Polland video is the only thing that is currently motivating you to get in touch with the media, then please don't neglect that on the basis of what I'm saying, but if you should happen to find a more readily available, easily researchable argument, let me suggest that it might improve your chances of getting more people in the media to recognize that this is a matter of genuine importance.
Humbly submitted for your consideration.
The first "black" President and the first female co-President were not about to dis their loyal base in an attempt to out the first real black (who's really only < 50% black) candidate with a "legitimate" shot at being POTUS. Coupled with the signs of the coming economic tsunami, Billary wouldn't move to play that (perceived by many on the left) ultimate race card for the world to see.
Besides, Hillary knows who a "natural born Citizen" is...having co-sponsored non-binding Senate resolution 511 which stated McCain was a NBC because he was born to two citizen parentS.
She know's full well Barry isn't a "natural born Citizen."
No way the Clintons missed a bone-head Campaign 101 opp-research item like eligibility.
The Clintoons missed the 20 year long association with jeremiah Wright didn’t they. That alone would have sunk him. Sorry, the preprations were already begun as early as 2004 for the usurper.
AberCommie has also stated that he personally saw the baby 0bama with his parents at many functions in Hawaii.
Isn’t that odd, since 0bama’s mama was going to college in Washington State during the year following his birth?
And 0bama Sr. was going to school in Massachusetts, the following year before he moved back to Kenya.
I haven’t seen a photo of you, so I cannot comment on the first part of your statement about yourself, but I certainly agree that you are irrelevant.
Psssssst BOt, they got the word that it does not exist. ROFL.
Since your comments had absolutely nothing to do with what you quoted from Mike, why did you quote him?
Excellent point, rxsid; I had not realized Hillary co-sponsored 511. That casts her perfidy in a new, even more rancid light. That is the danger of Obama, I guess; he’s so horrible, he almost makes us forget how bad the Clintons were/are.
HM, I think Obama had Hillary boxed in from day one. Do you recall Obama playing the race card against Bill in SC? Obama dealt from the bottom of the deck, and did Bill dirty (so to speak). This was when Bill wasn’t actually doing anything even remotely racist—but it turned blacks against him.
If the Clintons or their people had actually brought up Jeremiah Wright or NBC, can you imagine the broadside Obama would have unleashed? PC, and a kneepad press that went early for Obama, hamstrung the Clintons this last go-round. Obama is a true aficionado when it comes to the race card. It is one of his few actual skills.
It seems that jamese777 cannot read. It was 0bama that stated he was born at Queens, not the newspaper.
lol, I’m not sure what the picture of Queen Kapiolani has to do with it.
If your argument is solid, this guy beat the CLINTONS.
~~~
With billions of Soros funds and hundreds of millions of illegal, untraced foreign contributions behind TheOne?
Billions can buy a lot of operatives and operations .. and intimidation.
I’d think again.
jamese777 is simply an Obamabot Troll. From the amount of posts made here and other places on the web is appears jamese777 is a Paid Obamabot and not very convincing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.