Posted on 12/10/2010 12:49:40 PM PST by The Conservative Monster
"If the Tea Party Leaders refuse to defend Lt Col Lakin, then we will HIJACK the next big Tea Party DAY and make it ONE BIG Lt Col Lakin National Rally. This day will be called Operation: Tea Party Hijack" - Steve Cooper
Go to The Conservative Monster.com for more details.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativemonster.com ...
Threats are always a good idea. [/sarc]
So what does his case have to do with taxes and fiscal policy? It’s outside the scope of the Tea Parties interests, IMO.
LOL, prepare to be jumped on by the socons...
The TEA party interests are not simply taxes and fiscal policy. The TEA party stands for restoring Constitutional government. This is a Constitutional issue.
Get in line.
Everybody and his dog is trying to co-opt the TPM
It will probably fracture because of it.
not here
wait
Tea Party “leaders?” This is precisely why the Tea Party is leaderless, so the goals can’t be co-opted.
Why didn’t you post the whole thing instead of doing a blog pimp?
Threats backed by action is a good thing when justified. This is a just cause.
Good luck with that.
The leftward slide of this country (that the tea party is trying to turn around) has been going on for decades, long before Obama was even born. Getting hold of Obama's birth certificate won't turn that around.
The plain fact is, the tea party's goals are bigger than Obama. It's not about Obama, it is about reversing a half century of big government growth. If you can't see that, then you have missed the entire point of the tea party movement.
When the tea party express came through last time there was some clown floating around the fringes screaming that the tea party supports abortion and demanding equal time.
He didn’t find much sympathy because the people know better.
“Threats are always a good idea. [/sarc]”
Orly College of Law.
“If the Tea Party Leaders refuse to defend Lt Col Lakin, then we will HIJACK the next big Tea Party DAY”
-
There is no “Tea Party”; there are no “Tea Party Leaders.
I am a tea-partier; I belong to no groups; I am a free man.
Who is the big bold “we” in “we will hijack...”?
I will not be hijacked for this issue or for any other special interest issue.
I am Jim Thompson!
I agree with those that state that the Tea Party is more than just supporting one view. To try and divide the Tea Party for this one subject is a loser. Sounds to me that someone just wants to kill the Tea Party.
I don’t believe Obama was eligible but I know he isn’t going anywhere till the next election.
blog pimp alert!
I have heard repeated reports about the Obama Eligibility issue being censored at Tea Party rallies and this censorship has to end. I witnessed this censorship firsthand on 9/12/09 in Washington DC when Orly Taitz was denied the right to speak at the rally. I was outraged and wondered “what are they so scared of? Why are they collaborating with the media blackout on the Obama Eligibility issue?”
AND do not give me that bullshit that this is not the purpose of the Tea Party either. I hear all of you frauds speak about the U.S. Constitution as you all sweep this issue under the rug? This is hypocrisy and cowardice.
Namecalling works just as well. LOL
So if your local Tea Party refused to take up the issue of say, Bigfoot, it would be because they are "afraid of Bigfoot"? Maybe the Tea Party isn't "afraid" of the birther issue. Maybe they just think it's a stupid waste of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.