Threats are always a good idea. [/sarc]
So what does his case have to do with taxes and fiscal policy? It’s outside the scope of the Tea Parties interests, IMO.
Get in line.
Everybody and his dog is trying to co-opt the TPM
It will probably fracture because of it.
Tea Party “leaders?” This is precisely why the Tea Party is leaderless, so the goals can’t be co-opted.
Why didn’t you post the whole thing instead of doing a blog pimp?
Good luck with that.
The leftward slide of this country (that the tea party is trying to turn around) has been going on for decades, long before Obama was even born. Getting hold of Obama's birth certificate won't turn that around.
The plain fact is, the tea party's goals are bigger than Obama. It's not about Obama, it is about reversing a half century of big government growth. If you can't see that, then you have missed the entire point of the tea party movement.
“If the Tea Party Leaders refuse to defend Lt Col Lakin, then we will HIJACK the next big Tea Party DAY”
-
There is no “Tea Party”; there are no “Tea Party Leaders.
I am a tea-partier; I belong to no groups; I am a free man.
Who is the big bold “we” in “we will hijack...”?
I will not be hijacked for this issue or for any other special interest issue.
I am Jim Thompson!
I agree with those that state that the Tea Party is more than just supporting one view. To try and divide the Tea Party for this one subject is a loser. Sounds to me that someone just wants to kill the Tea Party.
blog pimp alert!
Warning blog pimping in progress
In related Obama eligibility news, the Quo Warranto pleading by Orly Taitz in Taitz v Obama was rejected for reconsideration by Chief US District Court Judge for the District of Columbia Royce C. Lamberth.
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2010cv0151-38
Obama’s election exposes the roots of something planned for and going on in the USA. I believe the Tea Partyers have seen and grabbed on to what is going on. I hope people in the movement do not lose the zeal for the goals that were the result of the November elections and that the goals are carried for future years. With this being a hope, I believe also that the root of what has been planned for the USA has not been fully unearthed in the Tea Party movement even though Obama is an indicator. As such it is necessary to get to the bottom of Obama’s political growth and the sooner the better for the USA. The rapid changes todate are good portents of what is intended. All legal, ethical and effective info should be used to unearth Obama and his cabal. As to Lakin’s situation I believe it should be his decision as to how to make his case. I would hope he would approve of like oriented people adding expressed public concern as to his concern.
Obama’s election exposes the roots of something planned for and going on in the USA. I believe the Tea Partyers have seen and grabbed on to what is going on. I hope people in the movement do not lose the zeal for the goals that were the result of the November elections and that the goals are carried for future years. With this being a hope, I believe also that the root of what has been planned for the USA has not been fully unearthed in the Tea Party movement even though Obama is an indicator. As such it is necessary to get to the bottom of Obama’s political growth and the sooner the better for the USA. The rapid changes todate are good portents of what is intended. All legal, ethical and effective info should be used to unearth Obama and his cabal. As to Lakin’s situation I believe it should be his decision as to how to make his case. I would hope he would approve of like oriented people adding expressed public concern as to his concern.
I lost interest in this blog at the very beginning:
“The Court Martial of Lt Col Lakin, a great American hero begins on Dec 14th, 2010...”
Lakin isn’t a “great American hero.”
Isn’t he the guy who threw away his career because he wanted to make a point? He’s obviously guilty of the charges, and needs to accept the consequences of his acts.
Once you make a decision, you need to accept the consequences. There was no foreseeable outcome except the present one. If I’m thinking of the right guy, the only question is what should be the penalty for refusing an order to go to a combat zone in a time of war.
Since I advocated harsh treatment for the liberals who tried this under Bush, I don’t see where I can consistently advocate a different approach here.
I miss all the best zot parties.