WILL HAWAII EVER COME CLEAN ON OBAMA?

The Post & Email ^ | Oct. 22, 2010 | Sharon Rondeau

[STE=Q]

"The Post & Email has been requesting Certificates of Nomination from the Hawaii Elections Office since July but has been denied access, even though the documents in question have been in the public domain for many months and have been reported on extensively by other researchers and bloggers.

We previously reported that our requests to both the Department of Health and the Elections Office and those of many other citizens have been stonewalled, denied, ignored, or responded to by an attempt to bill the other party for an item that was never produced."

[Beckwith]

The short answer is no.

[screaminsunshine]

The Communist Party is too well entrenched there.

[STE=Q]

Ping to a few!

STE=Q

[FrankR]

That would probably incriminate a lot of people in Hawaii, and the whistleblower’s life wouldn’t be worth a plug nickel.

[A CA Guy]

Hawaii is a big Democrat machine and a huge welfare state. They consider protecting Democrats as a must to maintain the entitlements that go to the state.

[Red Steel]

"From: Sharon Rondeau
Sent: Wed 9/15/10 9:58 AM
To: Linden Joesting (oip@hawaii.gov)
Bcc: Redacted

-snip-

All I have asked for is certified copies of the DNC and RNC Certification of Nomination forms for presidential elections 2008, 2004, and 2000. I would think that the 2008 ones are in PDF format and can be quickly accessed and emailed to me. I cannot imagine that the others would not be easily accessible as well."

- - - -

Obama for the state of Hawaii and did not state Obama was qualified under the US Constitution. According to Hawaiian Law Revised Statutes 11-113, it does not specify that the the Hawaiian DNC had to certify Obama in Hawaii but that a recognized party does it. It took the National DemoRat party to certify Obama to satisfy Hawaiian law.

- - - -

The evidence:

Hawaiian Law Revised Statutes 11-113 (Presidential Ballots). The Hawaiian DNC state party left out for Obama's certification that he is qualified under the US Constitutional, which is highlighted in the letter below.

Here is the Hawaiian DNC certification for Obama, which is missing the qualification under the US Constitution and for the state of Hawaii.

John Kerry's 2004 Hawaiian party DNC Certification. Notice that Kerry is qualified under the US Constitutional and for the state of Hawaii.

Al Gore's 2000 Hawaiian DNC party certification. You will also notice that he fully complies with Hawaiian Revised Statutes 11-113.

Enter Nancy Pelosi signed statement... because Hawaii did not fully certify Barack Hussein Obama. Pelosi signs the statement to fulfill the required Hawaiian law under Revised Statutes 11-113.

Repeat again from the letter,

"Hawaii Revised Statutes 11-113 (Presidential Ballots) provides that a recognized political party will provide the Office of Elections with following information prior to placing the names of its candidates for President and Vice President on the Presidential ballot:...."
- - - - -

[mowowie]

They have to cover up for the education scam with foreign students that they were pulling over on the feds for millions of dollars back in the 60’s and 70’s from what i’ve heard.

[Forward the Light Brigade]

Not in our lifetimes.

[newheart]

What, me worry?

[STE=Q]

The short answer is no.

I just want to go on record and state:

There NEVER was, or is there now, a COVER-UP for Obongo and company, in Hawaii.

So move along...

Nothing to see here!(sarc)

STE=Q

[Texas Fossil]

The best explanation I have read is that HI when it was admitted to the Union commonly practiced “fraud” as per birth records in order to receive more federal money. Therefore both Dems and Republican do not want to open that can of worms. There is a lot financially riding on the outcome of that, much more than the consequences of the Obozo election.

[LucyT]

[Thanks, STE=Q.]

[STE=Q]

Great post RS!

Would you be so kind as to ping some of the anti-”birther” Trolls?

It’s SOO much fun to watch them deny the obvious!(LOL!)

STE=Q

[nascarnation]

If Joe the Plumber had been in Hawaii, we’d know the status of his trade license in minutes. In Ohio it took a day or two.

[tutstar]

No, it would be interesting to know who is being told what by who and what would happen to them if they did.

[STE=Q]

Here is the Hawaiian DNC certification for Obama, which is missing the qualification under the US Constitution and for the state of Hawaii.

Serving under "the provisions of the united States Constitution" (OR) Serving under "the provisions of the national Democratic Parties?

What's the big difference? (sarc)

Picky! Picky! Picky!

STE=Q

[Red Steel]

Great post RS!

Would you be so kind as to ping some of the anti-”birther” Trolls?

It’s SOO much fun to watch them deny the obvious!(LOL!)

STE=Q

OK, here you go. ;-)

[El Cid]

Re: 7

Interesting post and comparison of the different documents (Obama's vs. Kerry's vs. Gore's vs. Hawaiian Law).
I had never seen that before.

Indeed, 'legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution' vs. 'legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the Democrat party' ...
Quite a big difference. Thanks for the Post.

[STE=Q]

"OK, here you go"

I wonder how many will show up?

After last night, their overseers must have given them hell.

Heads must have rolled!(LOL!)

STE=Q