Posted on 10/13/2010 4:44:05 AM PDT by 1234
In many states, proof of eligibility is required for various offices, including the presidency. Since this documentation does not exist for BHO, the various state agencies responsible for balloting presidential candidates where specific proof of constitutional eligibility is required have failed to uphold their respective state laws. They have also failed the citizens of their states and the nation.... Below are several state laws which were not upheld in the case of BHO. In Hawaii, South Carolina and Texas, state laws require the Party to certify constitutional eligibility. In Texas and South Carolina, this was apparently done without any court-vetted documents. In Hawaii, it appears that the state Democratic Party refused to certify constitutional eligibility; therefore, Nancy Pelosi, as representative of the Democrat National Committee, signed a nomination form stating that Obama and Biden were qualified. However, that document was filed only in Hawaii; the other 49 states received a nomination form which did not contain the “constitutionally-eligible” language. It appears that Pelosi signed the Hawaii form without any court-vetted documents.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
IF they allowed any inproprities in McRino’s eligibility, then how can the Rino’s question Odumbo’s eligility.
I think the Dumborats suckered the Rino’s into this and now they are afraid of the consequences.
IMO, fraud should have always been the bigger focus, and not Obama’s eligibility. The average voter understands the concept of fraud, but would not understand the nuances of the natural born citizenship clause and constitutional eligibility. As a criminal activity, it would be hard, even for a Democrat-controlled Congress, to ignore clear proof that Obama committed fraud. As such, he would resign or be impeached.
Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Senator Hussein Obama (D-IL)
Senator Tom Coburns (R-OK)
Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Senator Jim Webb(D-VA)
Notice there’s only one Republican was on the committee.
According to the state of Hawaii, it does.
Oh, oh!
Rights panel seeks testimony from Justice
New Black Panther intimidation probe at issue
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights wants Attorney General H. Holder Jr., to allow Justice Department employees to testify in its investigation of “deep-seated and shockingly common attitudes favoring racially-selective enforcement of the law” within the department’s Civil Rights Division.
The request is outlined in a letter to be delivered Tuesday to Mr. Holder, following a 5-1 vote Friday by the commission, seeking additional testimony and documents in its investigation of the department’s handling of the New Black Panther Party case.
READ MORE.......
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/11/rights-panel-seeks-testimony-from-justice/?page=1
Are we talking about a LFBC?? The state of Hawaii has never said such a thing exists. They talked about an ‘original birth certificate,’ but this could be referring to an undoctored abstract issued when Obama filed his amended paperwork.
Or it could be referring to his original birth certificate.
Except that his original birth certificate doesn’t prove where Obama was born, and hence has no value toward determining his Constitutional eligibility. The state of Hawaii told us this.
What is an LFBC?
Long Form Birth Certificate
bttt
"AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?"
No answer. We got instant amnesia from GreaseRod.
Or he answered the question by saying, “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”
Those aren’t members of a committee. They’re co-sponsors of a non-binding resolution. Get your facts straight.
Why are you so obcessed with his Long-form when:
A) A short form is just as good in the eyes of any court of Federal Agency for the purposes of proving place of birth and
B) You think he's ineligble no matter where he was born.
What is 'obcessed'??
A) A short form is just as good in the eyes of any court of Federal Agency for the purposes of proving place of birth and
No short form has been presented to any court 'or' Federal Agency. And it not 'just as good' when it lacks the elements that help certify it, such as Obama's jpg and its variants (which is why it has NOT been presented to any court or Federal Agency).
B) You think he's ineligble no matter where he was born.
First I want to establish the truth and second, the people of the United States need to realize they've been defrauded by a grifter, and three, voters need to understand that the system has failed to prevent the seating of a fraud.
Please name a single president elect who has ever had to present a birth certificate, short form or long form, to a court of federal agency.
And it not 'just as good' when it lacks the elements that help certify it,
The photographs of the document all indicate it has those elements.
First I want to establish the truth and second, the people of the United States need to realize they've been defrauded by a grifter,
Unfortunately, in order to do that, you'd have to prove they've been defrauded, and you can't.
and three, voters need to understand that the system has failed to prevent the seating of a fraud.
Well, that assumes he is a fraud, and all evidence indicates he isn't.
One thing is for sure there is no one who has the balls as the Founders who risked everything to fight against England and the South who waged a War of Independence against the tyranny in Washington.
Does anyone have a backbone?
I dont see how he is getting away with this. I guess the “powers” believe the black folk would riot and burn the usa down if Hussein was given the boot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.