Posted on 10/13/2010 4:44:05 AM PDT by 1234
In many states, proof of eligibility is required for various offices, including the presidency. Since this documentation does not exist for BHO, the various state agencies responsible for balloting presidential candidates where specific proof of constitutional eligibility is required have failed to uphold their respective state laws. They have also failed the citizens of their states and the nation.... Below are several state laws which were not upheld in the case of BHO. In Hawaii, South Carolina and Texas, state laws require the Party to certify constitutional eligibility. In Texas and South Carolina, this was apparently done without any court-vetted documents. In Hawaii, it appears that the state Democratic Party refused to certify constitutional eligibility; therefore, Nancy Pelosi, as representative of the Democrat National Committee, signed a nomination form stating that Obama and Biden were qualified. However, that document was filed only in Hawaii; the other 49 states received a nomination form which did not contain the “constitutionally-eligible” language. It appears that Pelosi signed the Hawaii form without any court-vetted documents.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Not so far-fetched as one might suspect.
This approach may have more success than what has been attempted so far.
Good article. Everyone should PeteCat’s link. It explains the standing issues as well as the political question doctrine.
I have believed for over a year that we need to go after the local authorities for fraud and eventually somewhere, someone will crack and spill the beans.
keep for later
mark
It seems that charges against election officials for malfeasance in office and failure to properly discharge their duties could and should be filed. Court cases at this level might force the truth out into the open.
I think there will be eligibility challenges to Obama being on the ballot in most of the states in 2012, any of which could expose the eligibility fraud perpetrated in 2008. I doubt Obama’s enablers will permit that to happen. He’s out.
As long as “certify” can be interpreted loosely, that’s what will happen. States need to specify a copy of a long form BC.
I still find it interesting that Hussein and Hillary were two of the six members on the SR511 committee to determine McRino’s “eligibility.”
If forced to ,obama will present a long form “birth certificate”. To satify Article 2 of the Constitution , it must state that both of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.. I’am sure that obama has a few friends in chicago that can print him a new “birthcertificate” with the proper informationn on it.
And Salazar in Colorado continues to insist Obummer was vetted long before he was sworn in. Also claims the electronic COLB and two newspaper accounts prove he was born in Hawaii which
avoids the NBC qualification-and the data included in this piece.Given Obummers war on AZ I would hope they all sign on as “birthers”
I've been wanting that for a long time.
Apparently the Arkansas certification image has been scrubbed from the internet because I can't seem to find it this morning. If anyone has it or can find it, please post it and ping me. It's not a legal document in that it is date stamped a year before Secretary of State Charlie Daniels signed it. Interesting, this is from Clinton territory making it not just a little oopsie.
Ignoring the fact that the newspaper announcements don't prove squat about his NBC, they don't even list his name, hahahahaha!
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.