Posted on 09/22/2010 9:26:01 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
Eh, don't worry, America. If there is another 9/11-like terror attack, The One says that we can "absorb it" and just become "stronger" because of it. It's as if he wants it to happen, or something!
In his latest book, Bob Woodward encountered a President Obama that seemed to casually blow off worry of another terror attack. The Washington Post gave us a sneak preview of Woodward's newest tome where Obama acted so flippantly toward another 9/11. (my bold)
Woodward's book portrays Obama and the White House as barraged by warnings about the threat of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and confronted with the difficulty in preventing them. During an interview with Woodward in July, the president said, "We can absorb a terrorist attack. We'll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever we absorbed it and we are stronger."If we are "stronger," and that is entirely debatable, it certainly isn't because of anything the Obama administration has done.
In fact Obama has done his level best to make us more vulnerable. From reducing the threat status, to eliminating intelligence programs that were getting results, to simply sending drones to wipe out terrorists (that then take any actionable intelligence to the gave), even to making a mockery of our strength by using childish euphemisms such as "overseas contingency operations," Obama has taken America off its security footings...
Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...
Great!.....How many American families can “absorb” the loss of a mother, a father, a daughter, a son, a child....?
You ridiculous A-hole!.....
Bring on the terrorists so we can become stronger. Great, this from a “teachers affirmative action pet” who actually believes diversity BS. Here’s betting Dems will have no problem swallowing another 9/11. My personal feeling is let the country known as “NORTHEAST” defend themselves. These are the same ones who were attacked, who then voted for Mr. Skittles and the party of surrender. Lets just hang a kick me sign on NYC and be done with it.
(1) He’s probably technically correct, though the word “absorb” is extremely poorly chosen. We can endure attacks without crumbling ...
(2) ... but we cannot endure ceaseless systematic attacks. It is his responsibility to prevent the next one. That we, as a nation, will likely endure does not mean his administration will.
(3) Even if he is right ... for the Commander-in-Chief to say aloud that the U.S. can “absorb” terrorism shows a level of irresponsibility not previously seen.
SnakeDoc
It’s a code word for the attack to happen in October, that way he can declare martial law and postpone elections.....
There is a special place in h___ for this obscenity.
How do we counter this? If the violence comes from a subversive source....?
Lefty Translation:
The USA deserves terrorist attacks because of all the world hardship caused by US Imperialism.
The left actually believe this and I hear it from them everyday.
It’s really quite an outrageous thing to say.
Just goes to show how cold and detached he is.
0 basically said, if the moslems kill our children, Americans should be absorbing? 0 is a moslem! There can be no doubt, any longer.
This man has SO surpassed the very definition of a traitor and absolutely committed crimes that rise to the level of treason.
Impeach this traitor NOW. Better Bozo Biden than this enemy of the country.
can he absorb them first?
neither me nor my family are here to ‘absorb’ attacks
this is the exact policy of the 90s. attack after escalating attack that resulted in 9-11. there is one step beyond 9-11 ... and hell if i’ll stand idle waiting for it.
If we “absorbed” 9/11 why do we still have a hole in the ground almost 10 years later?
An inspiring statement, if from a different leader at an earlier time in our nations history.
From this leader, the few words convey two lies and a substantial delusion.
The statement may only be true with his perverted view of remaking rather than rebuilding the country.
Of course that sort of cynical expression of free speech has not been permissible since the end of the "previous administration", when it could be seen all over the Internet and on signs at protests.
I expect it will quickly be censored here by the moderator to avoid potential criticism from liberals who devote their lives to attacking everyone who disagrees with them.
Just like the Muslims are doing, Liberals are having success at getting their way by defining "hate speech" as anything they don't want to hear and attacking those who dare cross their always-moving line in the sand.
I increasingly see, through locked threads and removed comments, the success of their tactics here on FR in ways I'd never have thought I'd see a few years ago.
Does anyone actually believe terrorists were NOT trying to set off bombs in this country every single day since the 50s? They were!! Why were they unsuccessful, you might ask? Because we had intelligence agencies that were effective—and strong, tough men went out and KILLED the bad guys.
Why is that so hard for liberal wackadoodles like obama to understand?! And is obama so tough he doesn’t fear the attacks, even thought they might target him specifically? More likely, he knows his muslim brothers wouldn’t attack their ally.
Kill the bloody terrorists Barry Soetoro...oops Barack Hussein Obama.
TERRORISM: NO BIG DEAL
Obama is insensitive..no...worse...INCOMPETENT to serve as "Commander in Chief"
REMEMBER in N O V E M B E R!
You, your wife and daughters first, Mr. Obama.
*scream of rage*
This nightmare can’t end soon enough.
I’m sure the families of the 3000+ victims also “absorbed” their loss no problem.
What a national NIGHTMARE this POS is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.