Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Says U.S. Can 'Absorb Terror Attacks'
Publius Forum ^ | 09/22/10 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 09/22/2010 9:26:01 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

Eh, don't worry, America. If there is another 9/11-like terror attack, The One says that we can "absorb it" and just become "stronger" because of it. It's as if he wants it to happen, or something!

In his latest book, Bob Woodward encountered a President Obama that seemed to casually blow off worry of another terror attack. The Washington Post gave us a sneak preview of Woodward's newest tome where Obama acted so flippantly toward another 9/11. (my bold)

Woodward's book portrays Obama and the White House as barraged by warnings about the threat of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and confronted with the difficulty in preventing them. During an interview with Woodward in July, the president said, "We can absorb a terrorist attack. We'll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever… we absorbed it and we are stronger."
If we are "stronger," and that is entirely debatable, it certainly isn't because of anything the Obama administration has done.

In fact Obama has done his level best to make us more vulnerable. From reducing the threat status, to eliminating intelligence programs that were getting results, to simply sending drones to wipe out terrorists (that then take any actionable intelligence to the gave), even to making a mockery of our strength by using childish euphemisms such as "overseas contingency operations," Obama has taken America off its security footings...

Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 911; bho44; bhofascism; bhoislamism; bhotreason; bhotyranny; communism; crushislam; democrats; impeach; islam; islamicterrorism; islamofascism; liberalfascism; marxism; obama; obamavictorymosque; terrorism; theprophetobama; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Unbelievable! This Muslim-favoring president thinks we should just sit back and take attacks??
1 posted on 09/22/2010 9:26:04 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
IMPEACH!
2 posted on 09/22/2010 9:29:43 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Great!.....How many American families can “absorb” the loss of a mother, a father, a daughter, a son, a child....?

You ridiculous A-hole!.....


3 posted on 09/22/2010 9:29:57 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Bring on the terrorists so we can become stronger. Great, this from a “teachers affirmative action pet” who actually believes diversity BS. Here’s betting Dems will have no problem swallowing another 9/11. My personal feeling is let the country known as “NORTHEAST” defend themselves. These are the same ones who were attacked, who then voted for Mr. Skittles and the party of surrender. Lets just hang a kick me sign on NYC and be done with it.


4 posted on 09/22/2010 9:32:09 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

(1) He’s probably technically correct, though the word “absorb” is extremely poorly chosen. We can endure attacks without crumbling ...

(2) ... but we cannot endure ceaseless systematic attacks. It is his responsibility to prevent the next one. That we, as a nation, will likely endure does not mean his administration will.

(3) Even if he is right ... for the Commander-in-Chief to say aloud that the U.S. can “absorb” terrorism shows a level of irresponsibility not previously seen.

SnakeDoc


5 posted on 09/22/2010 9:32:28 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

It’s a code word for the attack to happen in October, that way he can declare martial law and postpone elections.....


6 posted on 09/22/2010 9:33:25 AM PDT by sniper63 (I am the leader of the TEA Party, I, myself am the leader of me, myself for I am the TEA Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

There is a special place in h___ for this obscenity.


7 posted on 09/22/2010 9:33:29 AM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

How do we counter this? If the violence comes from a subversive source....?


8 posted on 09/22/2010 9:35:26 AM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Lefty Translation:

The USA deserves terrorist attacks because of all the world hardship caused by US Imperialism.

The left actually believe this and I hear it from them everyday.


9 posted on 09/22/2010 9:35:45 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

It’s really quite an outrageous thing to say.

Just goes to show how cold and detached he is.


10 posted on 09/22/2010 9:36:09 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

0 basically said, if the moslems kill our children, Americans should be absorbing? 0 is a moslem! There can be no doubt, any longer.


11 posted on 09/22/2010 9:38:37 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

This man has SO surpassed the very definition of a traitor and absolutely committed crimes that rise to the level of treason.

Impeach this traitor NOW. Better Bozo Biden than this enemy of the country.


12 posted on 09/22/2010 9:38:52 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

can he absorb them first?

neither me nor my family are here to ‘absorb’ attacks

this is the exact policy of the 90s. attack after escalating attack that resulted in 9-11. there is one step beyond 9-11 ... and hell if i’ll stand idle waiting for it.


13 posted on 09/22/2010 9:44:21 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

If we “absorbed” 9/11 why do we still have a hole in the ground almost 10 years later?


14 posted on 09/22/2010 9:45:08 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

An inspiring statement, if from a different leader at an earlier time in our nation’s history.

From this “leader”, the few words convey two lies and a substantial delusion.

The statement may only be true with his perverted view of “remaking” rather than rebuilding the country.


15 posted on 09/22/2010 9:48:45 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Wake up America! You are losing the war against your families and your Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
We can most easily "absorb" it and be considerably stronger if it takes out him and his administration...especially his czars.

Of course that sort of cynical expression of free speech has not been permissible since the end of the "previous administration", when it could be seen all over the Internet and on signs at protests.

I expect it will quickly be censored here by the moderator to avoid potential criticism from liberals who devote their lives to attacking everyone who disagrees with them.

Just like the Muslims are doing, Liberals are having success at getting their way by defining "hate speech" as anything they don't want to hear and attacking those who dare cross their always-moving line in the sand.

I increasingly see, through locked threads and removed comments, the success of their tactics here on FR in ways I'd never have thought I'd see a few years ago.

16 posted on 09/22/2010 9:51:42 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Does anyone actually believe terrorists were NOT trying to set off bombs in this country every single day since the 50s? They were!! Why were they unsuccessful, you might ask? Because we had intelligence agencies that were effective—and strong, tough men went out and KILLED the bad guys.

Why is that so hard for liberal wackadoodles like obama to understand?! And is obama so tough he doesn’t fear the attacks, even thought they might target him specifically? More likely, he knows his muslim brothers wouldn’t attack their ally.

Kill the bloody terrorists Barry Soetoro...oops Barack Hussein Obama.


17 posted on 09/22/2010 9:53:32 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Let me paraphrase

TERRORISM: NO BIG DEAL

Obama is insensitive..no...worse...INCOMPETENT to serve as "Commander in Chief"

REMEMBER in N O V E M B E R!

18 posted on 09/22/2010 9:53:47 AM PDT by NorCoGOP (OBAMA: Living proof that hope is not a plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

You, your wife and daughters first, Mr. Obama.

*scream of rage*

This nightmare can’t end soon enough.


19 posted on 09/22/2010 9:53:53 AM PDT by turfmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

I’m sure the families of the 3000+ victims also “absorbed” their loss no problem.

What a national NIGHTMARE this POS is.


20 posted on 09/22/2010 9:56:04 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson