Posted on 08/26/2010 8:12:30 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
The Hill runs a report crediting Sarah Palin for her many Republic primary victories. Before conservatives take too much pleasure in such news, read how she is credited with helping sweep John McCain to victory. Palin traveled to Arizona and made numerous campaign appearances with McCain, bringing him the Tea Party creds he so desperately needed to undercut the fact that he is a nearly three-decades-long, left-leaning Washington insider.
That Palin chose to conveniently back McCain over conservative former U.S. Rep. J.D. Hayworth is a truth that should not soon be forgotten. Her help, McCain’s falsely running to the right, taking positions adverse to his established ones and $21 million dollars in attack ads did the trick.
Sarah Palin is all about expediency. She is no conservative.
Sorry, Boucheau, but that's a flat-out falsehood, as are all the rest of the charges you made against Governor Palin in your post.
That said, you've got every right to believe what you like about her, even though it may be based in liberal myth. Review her actual public record. You'll find that your charges don't stick.
That, of course, is totally up to you.
LOL...wow. And I thought I'd seen some wild theories posted here. That takes the cake.
Who died and made you FR royalty, toots?
You forgot to copy my Dr Frankenstein comment, that was the best part :)
The earmark kid got disposed of by Capt. Queeg on Boot Hill. Get over it and find something else to feed your PDS mantra. BTW tell your daddy pissant hello for us. At least his case was rather comical with a remote possibility of cure. Yours is rather sad. I’m afraid it’s terminal.
----------------------------------
Oh, I see, quitting an elected high-profile position is not being IN the system.
Yep, so folks will know what a double standard sack of crap your peddling with your drama queen posts. LOL
BTW, I'm not tired of getting my ankles bitten. I get a kick out of you "only Sarah" cultists. And this notion that you are defending the very essence of conservatism by lashing out like a scorned woman at people who can see through your goddess' veneer is beyond laughable.
Oh, did I accuse you of calling people "mean names"? No, I actually didn't. What I said, is that you launch in to making ad hominem attacks, the minute anyone challenges your filthy gutter trash maunderings.
Sure, thing toots - You're simply pathological, pissant. Not only do you misrepresent what occurred on that thread, you have to start calling names, as per your usual M.O.
I guess retards also can't read their own angst ridden malarkey.
Screw that. You keep talking like a gutter trash liberal (oh my, that dreaded name calling), and I'm gonna keep exposing you for what you are.
Have at it. Expose away. And in your spare time read up on LOST, TARP, and Comprehensive Immigration Reform so you at least understand what your Goddess stands for.
You’re back? Geez, I guess I’m not you after all (a favorite theory of the cackle of palinites).
_______________________________________________
Keeping one's word? Do you mean like taking an oath to serve the people who elected you and then actually doing the job?
Sometimes this is just too easy.
I think I’ve seen you (Lord knows if they knew our history fighting they’d never make that mistake), Rabscuttle, and Stephenjohnbanker all called ‘pissant’. I’m honored.
Continue with your PDS as I cannot get you to be reasonable.
_________________________________
Yeah, I forgot to ask...you and LS still dating?
OK, just kidding, I used to enjoy those frivolous dust-ups.
LOL. I will go to my grave believing Sinclair.
________________________________
If by reasonable you mean buying the spin on her quitting and her lack of POTUS qualifications then you are correct.
” Have at it. Expose away. And in your spare time read up on LOST, TARP, and Comprehensive Immigration Reform so you at least understand what your Goddess stands for. “
You forgot carbon credits.
You forgot graduated “ windfall profits tax”
Sounds very much like all of Ted Kennedy’s positions.......or maybe John McCain’s
2 is a number
Yes, that PDS.
Of course it’s easy, if you have no intellectual honesty. I would argue your point, but as the saying goes; “Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.”
And as you just proved by arguing MY point, YOUR word means nothing.
Thanks for playing.
Fixed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.