TWO COMMON MISTAKES CONSERVATIVES MAKE WHEN SECOND GUESSING OBAMA ON IRAN

WEBTODAY (August 1, 2010)-- Conservatives often make two mistakes when it comes to second guessing Obama with regard to Iran.

First they assume that since Obama is a liberal, if not outright Communist, he's some sort of peacenik dove and that he'd never make a preemptive strike against another nation. Let me ask you this: Did Communist Russia or Communist China hesitate to preemptively kill millions of people?

Second, they simply say Obama is a Muslim or a Muslim sympathizer, assuming he'd never authorize a preemptive strike on Iran, totally forgetting that there are two major warring Muslim factions. More accurately, Obama's Muslim heritage is rock solid Sunni Muslim, thus the need to bow to the Sunni Saudi king, and not to bow to any of the Mullahs of Iran.

What's more, Obama is unlikely to hesitate in proactively and offensively attacking Iran, if it fits in with his pro-Sunni, anti-Shiite agenda.

So today when news broke out today that the U.S. military has plans to attack Iran, it should come as no surprise since this is the final power shift to let Sunni Moslems first take over the Middle East, and later the world. The only major stumbling block standing in their way is big, bad Iran, the most powerful of the remaining Shiite regions.

Shiite Moslems are in the minority. Sunnis represent the vast majority of Muslims throughout the world, so this final battle to neutralize Iran may be the beginning of the end. Yet, Most Americans will likely view it as a unilateral victory, without noticing that the larger part of the dual purpose battle was to lock in Sunni Islam and their final stranglehold on the world.

Joint Chiefs Chairman Mullen, the highest ranking military officer in the U.S., made this statement about attacking Iran while on Meet the Press today: "I think the military options have been on the table and remain on the table. It's one of the options that the president has. Again, I hope we don't get to that, but it's an important option and it's one that's well understood."

Revolutionary Guard deputy chief Yadollah Javani countered saying, "The Persian Gulf is a strategic region. If the security of this region is endangered, they will suffer losses too and our response will be firm."

Javani was reiterating a not to veiled threat to target Tel Aviv, the second-largest city in Israel, if Israel or the United States were to take military action against Iran.

GOD KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE.

GOD KNOWS HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM . . . EVEN THROUGH THE ISRAELI’S BY ANGELIC FORCES . . . EVEN TURNING THEM ON THE SAUDI’S THEMSELVES.

STILL . . . NOT GREAT NEWS.

LUB

First they assume that since Obama is a liberal, if not outright Communist, he's some sort of peacenik dove and that he'd never make a preemptive strike against another nation. Let me ask you this: Did Communist Russia or Communist China hesitate to preemptively kill millions of people? Second, they simply say Obama is a Muslim or a Muslim sympathizer, assuming he'd never authorize a preemptive strike on Iran, totally forgetting that there are two major warring Muslim factions. More accurately, Obama's Muslim heritage is rock solid Sunni Muslim, thus the need to bow to the Sunni Saudi king, and not to bow to any of the Mullahs of Iran... unlikely to hesitate in proactively and offensively attacking Iran, if it fits in with his pro-Sunni, anti-Shiite agenda... U.S. military has plans to attack Iran... should come as no surprise since this is the final power shift to let Sunni Moslems first take over the Middle East, and later the world...

The dolt who scrawled this still managed to blame Israel. What a joke.

rumors:

hubris and nimrodness:

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.