Skip to comments.Sources say smackdown of Obama by Supreme Court may be inevitable
Posted on 07/13/2010 1:45:56 AM PDT by Red Steel
click here to read article
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.
This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Be still my heart ..
I see you found the nugget Star. :-)
This would be an EXCELLENT time for Republicans to stall further Obama appointments to ALL Federal judgeship.
How does adherence to the constitution become a ‘smack down’.
This is a ridiculous premise.
That wouldn’t be a nugget ... it would be
the Blessed Boulder ........ ;)
I’m hip. Anytime an article starts with “Sources Say”...
Should have known better.
Keep dreaming. When was the last time the GOP did anything but roll over and play dead every time 0bama wanted to do anything? They helped vote to confirm the "wise" Latina. They seem quite eager to confirm the she-man. Apparently the GOP thinks that the word "bork" is only something the Swedish Chef says.
And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm. ...
Agreed. Sources also said Rahm Emanuel was going to resign as well. He's still there.
I am amazed to hear that the Kagan vote has been delayed one week at the request of the republicans.
Don’t have any details.
“Be still my heart ..”
Big difference between knowing something is wrong and doing anything about it.
rahm was to resign in a few months, not immediately. I think it was to be around Christmas.
Isn’t the author of this little piece of sensationalism the same guy who got Zotted for threatening you? Us? Somebody?
Obamacare is squarely in the Court’s pervue. The author sets out the law’s basic flaw well.
However the president’s qualifications to hold office are affirmed by the electoral college and not some court. The Constitution sets forth the only ways a president may be removed: Expiration of his term of office, Impeachment in the Senate, and Death or Resignation allowing the VP to take office. Whatever his personal opinions, anyone expecting Roberts to issue a cease and desist order telling Obama to vacate the White House is kidding himself.
As for Holder, he is an Executive Branch officer. Separation of Powers most likely will shield him.
First, I am not a lawyer.
It seems that BHO was not the POTUS until Roberts swore him in. Remember, they did it twice to make sure.
If Roberts swore BHO in on false pretenses, could Roberts rescind or invalidate the swearing in?
I know one cannot transfer title of stolen goods.
WTH?!?! Never heard that one before. Since when are the qualifying documents to serve as potus the responsibility of the electoral college?
I'd like to believe that, but I don't. Still, I do think Bambi's on a collision course with the SC, although I don't know what is going to provoke the final confrontation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.