To: Red Steel
How does adherence to the constitution become a ‘smack down’.
This is a ridiculous premise.
5 posted on
07/13/2010 1:55:43 AM PDT by
Carley
(For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: Carley
I’m hip. Anytime an article starts with “Sources Say”...
Should have known better.
7 posted on
07/13/2010 2:03:20 AM PDT by
onona
(dbada)
To: Carley
It becomes a smackdown because so many in the government are ignoring/violating it.
69 posted on
07/13/2010 8:49:53 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Carley
How does adherence to the constitution become a ‘smack down’.
This is a ridiculous premise.
If a president is pushing unconstitutional programs, then a ruling that upholds the Constitution is, indeed, a smackdown of the unconstitutional president.
103 posted on
07/13/2010 10:59:47 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: Carley
How does adherence to the constitution become a ‘smack down’. Because it's the function of the Supreme Court to "smack down" attempts to violate the Constitution. Whoever is doing the violating gets "smacked down".
Hopefully very very hard in this case.
147 posted on
07/14/2010 7:47:26 AM PDT by
El Gato
("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson