Posted on 04/05/2010 2:40:28 PM PDT by Welshman007
In light of numbing revelations over the last several days concerning fraudulent statements on Barack Obama's resume, this piece of information curiously comes to light. The White House has instructed the 'mainstream media' not to report what they may discover.
The White House directive was issued as part of a deal struck between the Office of the President and reporters of the mainstream media.
In exchange for being given unprecedented access to Barack Obama, reporters would promise not to report 'certain matters' they may discover while covering the President.
From Steve Clemons at The Washington Note:
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
“We’ll give you unprecedented access to the fraud if you promise not to report ..... he is a fraud”
D’Oh.
He has already given about what, 500 interviews in the past year? What is “unprecedented access? A key to the elevator? A pillow at the foot of Barry’s bed? In exchange for what? Not breaking perhaps the greatest story of fraud and deception in US political history?
The truth will come out - Barry has no place to hide.
Whatever reporter who breaks Obamagate will be vilified by the MSM.
When you factor in the ‘look the other way’ cozy relationship the MSM has with Dems, might have better luck looking at the NATIONAL ENQUIRER for real news.
Lying on a resume is not important enough to you? Anyone else would/could be fired right on the spot.
Al Capone was brought down for the least of his ‘crimes’.
...an asteroid.
We have a genuine ass hole as president.
Isn’t that how Saddam handled the media? Play my game and I’ll do interviews with you and such. Go against me and I’ll throw your whole organization out of my country. Fox had to report from Kuwait. CNN and CBS stayed and played. This is JUST like Saddam tactics, the more I think about it.
Not really, his voters are.
That is not a stretch — ever since Clinton, the National Enquirer has been more reliable than the New York Times. I’m series.
don’t report OR ELSE...
I can’t believe he learned all those difficult languages, or even one of them. Yet I have heard the CIA story before (gossip—no source). His knowing something that could harm others sounds plausible. That would make him a counterspy in a way.
Collusion, isn’t that special.
You posted what I was thinking.
Please note—the article does not state that Obama was a CIA operative but merely raises the question based upon allegations of a few sources in the know. Right now, we are asking questions attempting to get at the truth. To ask the questions is not tantamount to stating this as a confirmed fact.
I would however suspect him of having been a drug-using, teenage gay prostitute; a commie, muslim, non-citizen, usurper, anti-American, POS, scumbag.
So, if we keep talking bad about him, he won't talk to us anymore?
...????....he can't spell CIA
“Unreal!”
Oh..it’s real alright. Real, dangerous and pathetic. Obama has turned into Chavez and the media are nothing but sociopathic, lying whores. We should start a boycott of every single book they manage to write.
In Soviet Russia, everyone KNEW that the Pravda came from the State. It really lost its effect within the country.
Our mission is to inform everyone that our mainstream news sources ALSO come from the State. Our news sources only have this power because Joe and Josie American still believe them.
The same guy who told them someone got shot today on South Street, and that it’s going to rain tomorrow, all provable, are also telling them lies about the government that they just suck in.
The fact that the media has received access to Obama in exchange for covering up anything bad about him needs to be exposed everywhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.