Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If the House passes the Senate bill, it goes to the president. Reconciliation is a smokescreen!

Posted on 03/03/2010 7:09:50 PM PST by cotton1706

I've been wondering why nobody has been saying this. If the house passes the senate bill, then the legislative process is complete. They can just send it to the president and it becomes law. They can amend the law of course with reconciliaton or whatever.

I think that is what's going on here. I think the senate is going to convice enough house members that they can pass health care through reconciliation. Then those house members push health care over the line in the house. Then they just forget about reconciliation and send the bill to the president.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
Thoughts?
1 posted on 03/03/2010 7:09:50 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The house didn’t have the votes for “The Senate” bill that’s why they want to make certain changes in reconciliation.


2 posted on 03/03/2010 7:11:48 PM PST by omega4179 (jdforsenate.com hunt some rinos 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

That is how I see it.


3 posted on 03/03/2010 7:12:30 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

The Senate has not yet voted on the bill. They only voted to end debate by Cloture I believe around Christmas Eve,


4 posted on 03/03/2010 7:14:27 PM PST by Eric Roelfsema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

There are things about the Senate bill that are toxic to various factions of the 218 Dems that voted for it the first time around.

[1] The Louisiana Purchase and the Nebraska Pork bribe are kryptonite to blue dogs and Dems in competitive districs.

[2] Abortion. The Senate bill is lax on abortion and there are a number of the 218 Dems who voted before who have already said they will not vote for the Senate bill.

[3] Retirements/Death. Several of the 218 have retired, one has died.

[4] Overall Drag. Voting for this bill will be a millstone around the neck of any politician, and will be political suicide for Dems in competitive districts.

They might somehow get it done, but I doubt it.


5 posted on 03/03/2010 7:15:25 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

Hope you are right!


6 posted on 03/03/2010 7:16:38 PM PST by DooDahhhh (AMEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric Roelfsema

>> The Senate has not yet voted on the bill.

Not true. The Senate DID pass the bill.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/24/health.care/index.html


7 posted on 03/03/2010 7:18:45 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Steny Hoyer on just this subject in Roll Call, just yesterday...

"“We could pass the reconciliation first, have the reconciliation passed by the Senate and then pass the Senate bill,” Hoyer said. From there, he said, the president would have to sign the Senate bill first and then the reconciliation package."

The House Dems don't trust the Senate Dems. They're going to demand - and get - that the Reconciliation Bill get passed first.

8 posted on 03/03/2010 7:20:27 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Roelfsema
The Senate has not yet voted on the bill. They only voted to end debate by Cloture I believe around Christmas Eve,

Incorrect, the Senate passed their own version of the bill. Both houses considered a conference committee in order to produce a single bill, but this was deemed infeasible. However, if the House passes the Senate version, then that bill can be sent to the President and signed into law. The Senate is promising that they won't do that before making changes under Reconciliation that would then be voted on once again by the House.

9 posted on 03/03/2010 7:20:28 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

“The house didn’t have the votes for “The Senate” bill that’s why they want to make certain changes in reconciliation.”

I just like to add one thing to this. It is because of Jim DeMint objecting to the confrees list that the House has to pass the Senate bill as is. It has nearly killed it because nearly everyone hates that bill on the right and left, except for maybe Obama and a few select bribees. The only way they have a hope to get enough votes for it in the House is to promise to change it through reconciliation, which in itself is a gamble. If they lose the parlamentary challenges, or lose their nerve after the House has already passed it, it could end up on Obama’s desk unchanged.


10 posted on 03/03/2010 7:20:51 PM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

They are going to use the House Bill not the Senate Bill.


11 posted on 03/03/2010 7:22:33 PM PST by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

What if the new bill contains ‘ways and means’ ?


12 posted on 03/03/2010 7:24:43 PM PST by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

If its the exact same bill, yes , it would be over.


13 posted on 03/03/2010 7:25:04 PM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Well.... I thought I understood it until I read this thread, now I’m more confused than ever -


14 posted on 03/03/2010 7:25:50 PM PST by Momto2 ("A sharp tongue is the only edge tool that grows keener with constant use" Irving - Rip Van Winkle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: y'all

Campaigner 2010:

“””VOTE FOR ME TO REPEAL 0BAMARXcare”””


15 posted on 03/03/2010 7:26:24 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
They are going to use the House Bill not the Senate Bill.

So, if they are voting on the House Bill - why does the House need to vote - they've already passed the "House bill"?

16 posted on 03/03/2010 7:27:40 PM PST by Momto2 ("A sharp tongue is the only edge tool that grows keener with constant use" Irving - Rip Van Winkle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Here is my question. If this bill passes into law, can it be undone by subsequent Congress? Does it not have a clause in the Bill that says that it can never be undone?


17 posted on 03/03/2010 7:28:46 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh
I think the Dem leadership is underestimating the cratering of support for this bill from rank-and-file Dems.
  1. Russ Feingold is losing to an undeclared candidate.
  2. Patty Murray is losing to an undeclared candidate.
  3. Blanche Lincoln is losing so terribly that she is being challenged in the Dem primary.
  4. Harry Reid will not break 40% in his bid for re-election and he is the majority leader.
  5. David Obey who is chair of Appropriations will probably lose. Unfathomable that chair of Appropriations might lose.
It is going to be a bad year for Dems in 2010 whether they pass it or not. It will be an unprecedented tsunami if they do pass it. If they force this through, every single Senate seat will go GOP that has a living human being on the GOP side who doesn't blow bubbles with his drool. Every single House seat will go GOP that McCain was within 6-10 points of Obama. It will be epic.
18 posted on 03/03/2010 7:29:09 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress

The bill has been changed with the usurpers new “additions”. Doesnt it require another vote by both?


19 posted on 03/03/2010 7:31:07 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Hoyer is wrong. The House cannot pass a reconciliation measure to a bill that has not become law.

Accordingly, the House must pass the Senate bill first - with all of its corruption - Cornhusker KIckback, Gator-Aid, Louisiana Purchase.

That bill would then go to the president for signature.

There is substantial speculation that the Senate will then refuse to consider reconciliation - leaving the Senate bill as the health care law. In this scenario, the House becomes the chumps, and BO and the Senate dupe them.


20 posted on 03/03/2010 7:31:14 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson