Skip to comments.
Welfare WAR is on FRONT IS OREGON
Posted on 01/28/2010 9:45:45 AM PST by New Hope Conservitive
Its on Oregon voters fire first shots at the rich, The rich are trenched in and planning a stunning blow to the hungry,homeless,lifetime welfare class. Many of the rich are warm and comfortable in there homes and offices, they plan on getting signatures to bring the fatal blow in the conflict. The weapon of legislation by way of proxy. The money is coming in and soon the ballet box will be stuffed with ballots on them a law stopping all funding of welfare funding. Welfare troops are having a hard time focusing due to not having a leader to tell them how to survive the possibility of losing the moneys from the rich. They keep begging the state legislator to help but they have now sided with rich troops as there only chance of surviving the next primaries. The poor troops are looking south towards California for new lands to migrate, and plunder a new battle against the riches left in the golden state. A lesson to be learned here is you should not turn on your neighbors for the comfort of the goverment. Your goverment does not care about you but your neighbors do or did.
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: conservitive; du; duer; eatthepoor; herekittykitty; iatz; ibtz; oregon; sleeper; sleeperagent; sleeperduer; sleepertroll; troll; trollbegone; unnngh; vikingkitties; weareyouroverlords; welfare; weruroverlords; zot; zotted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: DCBryan1
We are going to use our army of Rednecks that cling to their bibles and gunz...I GOT MINE!
61
posted on
01/28/2010 11:48:08 AM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
To: New Hope Conservitive
That you, Olby?
62
posted on
01/28/2010 12:00:07 PM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
To: indyhome11
I know they did. I live here.
And I am interested in seeing how many of those votes were fraudulent.
63
posted on
01/28/2010 12:04:13 PM PST
by
Danae
(Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
To: New Hope Conservitive
64
posted on
01/28/2010 12:11:22 PM PST
by
mojitojoe
(“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
To: Danae
One thing that broke from recent history in this election was the near instant release of the Multnomah County Results, which brought the calling by the Portland Dead Fishwrapper. I don't know what that means - but in earlier times it was always the small rural counties that were last to report their results and Tuesday seemed much a throwback to those days. Perhaps it is more indicative of fraud in other races where the margins were tighter, and the urban counties reported after inserting the required number of votes to win.
I don't know if it would ever be possible to determine a precise number of fraudulent votes but I dare say 90,000 in Oregon seems impossible unless they have perfected some unknown technique.
All quite possible in this vote by mail state, where there are weeks instead of hours to cook the results. That's one reason I usually turn in my ballot on election day and not before.
65
posted on
01/28/2010 12:26:24 PM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
To: Danae
Oh I forgot to add - I really want to see investigation and zero tolerance prosecution of the illegal campaign activities that were discussed on the 85 board.
What do you suppose the chances are of that happening?
66
posted on
01/28/2010 12:30:15 PM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
To: Clinging Bitterly
You have a darned good point. I think there is a number people can cal land check and see if their vote was received. Hum. I wonder what would happen if 100000 thousand people who voted no called in only to find their votes had been changed?
I am gonna look for that number.
67
posted on
01/28/2010 12:41:31 PM PST
by
Danae
(Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
To: Clinging Bitterly
I called Yamhill county - where I live, and was told you can call your county’s clerk’s office and they can tell you if your ballot was received, accepted, and therefore counted. There is No tabulation recording for HOW you voted. They separate the outside secrecy envelope from the inside ballot. I hope this helps some.
I know my ballot was received and counted.
68
posted on
01/28/2010 12:47:10 PM PST
by
Danae
(Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
To: New Hope Conservitive
Results of my Google search for “Conservitive”:
Urban Dictionary: conservitive
conservitive - 4 definitions - A conservative who can’t spell.
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conservitive
LOL!
69
posted on
01/28/2010 1:15:19 PM PST
by
Auntie Mame
(Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
To: New Hope Conservitive
I think it's a Zot stain!
70
posted on
01/28/2010 1:16:10 PM PST
by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: New Hope Conservitive; derllak; Lakeshark; null and void; Borax Queen; Darlin'; catpuppy
Dearest derrly, this is why Sharky tells yu to be very careful out there in Oregonistan.
People like this mind numbed poster run the show in your state.
71
posted on
01/28/2010 1:36:22 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: 50mm
Ah, well. I got here too late for the ZOT. Next time...next time...
72
posted on
01/28/2010 2:03:04 PM PST
by
bcsco
(Obama is the navel of his own universe.)
To: New Hope Conservitive
A little too much ‘hash’ in your ‘ish’ there buddy? Bet your folks drove Ramblers when you were a kid. You still kind of ramble on, don’t ya.
But then I’m writing to the dead myself. After all, you’re gone back to your land of prepubescence where all life is a question; especially when it comes to writing ability.
73
posted on
01/28/2010 2:07:36 PM PST
by
bcsco
(Obama is the navel of his own universe.)
To: Darksheare
Geez...even the title didn’t make sense, much less the rest of the article. You mind translating that for me? :P
74
posted on
01/28/2010 2:12:40 PM PST
by
derllak
To: New Hope Conservitive
IATZ! Oh well, at least I can enjoy the after-zot party.
75
posted on
01/28/2010 2:13:31 PM PST
by
rdl6989
(January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
To: derllak
I dunno, I don’t speak numblish.
But that’s what is running your state, so do be careful.
76
posted on
01/28/2010 2:14:07 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: Darksheare
Do garlic and crucifixes work on Democrats?
77
posted on
01/28/2010 2:43:17 PM PST
by
derllak
To: derllak
Do garlic and crucifixes work on Democrats?Depends on how hard you throw them.
78
posted on
01/28/2010 2:44:39 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: derllak
Not really.
Stake through the heart, but that works on everybody.
79
posted on
01/28/2010 3:08:51 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: New Hope Conservitive; sionnsar; Tax-chick; Monkey Face; Dead Corpse; BJClinton
:Pssst!:
Over here.
It's got stupidity, incoherence, misspelling AND poor grammar.
It's perfect!
80
posted on
01/28/2010 3:15:52 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(I miss the competent fiscal policy and flag waving patriotism of the Carter Administration)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson