Posted on 09/14/2009 10:45:24 AM PDT by American Dream 246
On September 9, 2009, a subpoena was issued by the District Court of the United States, 3rd Circuit, and has been served via registered mail (#RE184168898US) on the Consulate General of Kenya in Los Angeles.
The subpoena commands him to produce and permit the inspection and copying of the Certificate of Birth of Barack Hussein Obama II.
Source contains large graphic images and it's a slow-loading site -- be patient.
Obama, Hawaii and everyone else will ignore the subpoenas. The MSM will refuse to report.
What’s to keep him from replying, “We don’t have a BC for BHOII. He was born in Hawaii, as everyone knows”?
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
A District Court of the United States has no jurisdiction over a Consulate General of any country. This will be and should be ignored.
Wwweeeeeelllllll, this should be fun.
I though Berg v Obama died long ago when Judge Surrick dismissed it and the Supreme Court refused to take it up.
Let me take a guess this was filed by the “supreme Law” “private attorney general” who injected himself into Berg’s case...
That package was received in Seattle, WA on the 9th.
Was I right in thinking that #RE184168898US was a USPS tracking number?
The attorney who obtained the subpoena should be disbarred for incompetence.
Label/Receipt Number: RE18 4168 898U S
Class: First-Class Mail®
Service(s): Registered Mail™
Return Receipt
Status: Arrival at Unit
Your item arrived at 10:18 AM on September 14, 2009 in LOS ANGELES, CA 90020. Information, if available, is updated periodically throughout the day. Please check again later.
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
Enter Label / Receipt Number.
Detailed Results:
Arrival at Unit, September 14, 2009, 10:18 am, LOS ANGELES, CA 90020
Acceptance, September 09, 2009, 10:11 am, SEATTLE, WA 98105
BTTT
It's likely fake, or fraudulent.
I find it extremely hard to believe that the Federal Court for the Central District of California doesn't have a computer to fill in common legal forms, or at least a typewriter.
Yep. So it appears. Paul Andrew Mitchell?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.