Posted on 08/22/2009 12:07:48 AM PDT by patlin
Posted by constitutionallyspeaking(patlin) on August 21, 2009
Following up after a very informative debate on Wednesday evening, I set my sights to further research St. George Tucker and his commentaries on the Constitution. During the debate, the lawyer for the liberal cause was quite adamant that the 1790 Naturalization Act,even though it had been repealed, was the one law that backed his claims that Obama is constitutionally qualified under A2 S1 C5 of the Constitution. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story who was also the founder of Harvard Law School begs to differ with the libs and wishes to set them straight.
My mission is to get Obama’s multiple citizenships at birth exposed for what they are. As far as the Obama needing to relinquish his British citizenship, may I suggest this website:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html
Bookmark
For that you have to look to British law, not the Kenyan Constitution.
Not that it matters. US citizenship, and Natural Born Citizenship are matters of US Law, the US Constitution, and the meaning of "Natural Born Citizen" in 1787.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.