Skip to comments.
Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Florida
Tenth Amendment Center ^
| 07-10-09
| Tenth Amendment Center
Posted on 07/10/2009 9:33:03 AM PDT by sovereignty2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
More teeth for the state sovereignty movement. Will they beg the black-robed "gods" of the courts to approve of their rights? I hope not!
To: ForGod'sSake
2
posted on
07/10/2009 9:36:54 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
3
posted on
07/10/2009 9:38:09 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: sovereignty2
Need to get someone in Idaho on this me thinks, unless someone is already on it, and I think I know just the Senator for the job.
4
posted on
07/10/2009 9:39:35 AM PDT
by
Domandred
(Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
To: sovereignty2
So Kel-Tec can sell full automatics to Floridians? Silencers? Woohoo!
5
posted on
07/10/2009 9:39:39 AM PDT
by
Teflonic
To: sovereignty2
Good. Now go for the same language concerning micro-breweries and wineries and distillers who also produce only in state and sell only in state.
The feds have their sticky fingers in these pots, too.
6
posted on
07/10/2009 9:40:19 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
To: sovereignty2
Frankly, since the states are semi-sovereign nations, can’t FL import steel from VA to make guns without it being “interstate commerce” and involving the Feds?
To: sovereignty2
...I haven’t heard about this....I like it!
To: sovereignty2
"manufactured in state"I would guess this is an attempt to steer clear of the commerce clause, but my guess is that it won't work; federal preemption will find a way.
9
posted on
07/10/2009 9:48:34 AM PDT
by
americanophile
(Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
To: IYAS9YAS
Good. Now go for the same language concerning micro-breweries and wineries and distillers who also produce only in state and sell only in state.
The feds have their sticky fingers in these pots, too. Not to mention both medical & recreational uses of marijuana & other drugs.
10
posted on
07/10/2009 9:48:47 AM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
To: FreepShop1
>Frankly, since the states are semi-sovereign nations, cant FL import steel from VA to make guns without it being interstate commerce and involving the Feds?
Regulating interstate commerce based on what the raw materials MIGHT be used for is is dumb... really dumb. That would be the equivalent of disallowing Citizens the use of automobiles because they _might_ commit vehicular homicide.
11
posted on
07/10/2009 9:50:34 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: americanophile
“federal preemption will find a way. “
I agree. As soon as another state says that the Florida made guns ( or any of the other states ) are legal to import if you move, the Fed will jump.
12
posted on
07/10/2009 9:54:26 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: sovereignty2
I love my state when it comes to gun rights
13
posted on
07/10/2009 9:57:24 AM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
To: sovereignty2
Paragraph 5-d just OUTLAWED shotguns!
14
posted on
07/10/2009 10:02:31 AM PDT
by
2harddrive
(then)
To: Teflonic
No, alas - see comment 14. They INCORRECTLY tried to ban machine guns.
15
posted on
07/10/2009 10:06:58 AM PDT
by
2harddrive
(then)
To: sovereignty2
Socialists Obama, most of Congress, and Sotomayor won’t like this. Tough.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: sovereignty2
These bills need to mention every major national gun control act and decision or they’re otherwise meaningless. I mean, if a state pretty much spits in the eye of the FED, what use is it if you can’t manufacture fully automatic firearms?
18
posted on
07/10/2009 10:25:38 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The Tree is thirsty and the hogs are hungry.)
To: sovereignty2
Uh oh, looks like that queer Crist is going to have to step out of the tanning booth and take a side on this one.
This should be good.
19
posted on
07/10/2009 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: 2harddrive
No
Yet again, states aren’t doing it right. Seriously, what’s the use if they’re not made with an auto-sear? This should be the whole reason states are doing this. So they can manufacture every type of firearm without bending over backwards to the federal government.
20
posted on
07/10/2009 10:38:20 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The Tree is thirsty and the hogs are hungry.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson