Posted on 02/15/2009 7:51:01 PM PST by fiscon1
Rabid far-right commentator Ann Coulter is known across America for sliming everyone and everything she disagrees with. Al Gore is a “total fag” and another one-time presidential candidate, John Edwards, is the same. Democrats are “gutless traitors” and their convention a “Spawn of Satan” gathering. Muslims are “ragheads” and America should “kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.” Jews are people who need to be “perfected.” The New York Times building and its editorial staff should be bombed. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens should have “rat poisoning” mixed into his food. Princess Diana “ostentatiously [had] sex in front of [her] children.” The Rev. Al Sharpton is “a fat, race-baiting black man.” President Bill Clinton was “a very good rapist,” and North Korea should be “nuked.”
(Excerpt) Read more at splcenter.org ...
Opinions are like armpits. Everyone has a couple, and some of them stink.
Check.
The Rev. Al Sharpton is “a fat, race-baiting black man.”
Check and so is Je$$e J@ck$0n.
fisconl is a troll. Check
Poverty pimps stole a nation with lies and deception.... haven't you heard we were just strapped with a 3 trillion dollar mortgage on Friday the 13th... And you think what poverty pimps have to say is relevant???
ZOT!!
...I think I picked up a bug......that eye is following me.
My understanding of FR, based on lurking and posting, is that this is a site for fellow FRiends and conservatives to talk, not to fight amongst ourselves.
Picking fights - even simply by not recognizing the import of your post - is a no-no.
Misunderstanding this site is no longer an excuse for you as it has been explained quite clearly. Posting like this again is, in fact, troll behavior IMHO.
More experienced FReepers will correct me if I'm wrong.
I don’t disagree with Anne on any of those statements. What’s your problem?
How cool is that? Thanks for posting.
Is it real? If so, do you know the story behind it?
Got up this morning ate my 2 cooked eggs and had a nice HOT Zot to go with it, Thanks!
I don't know. I got it in an email. It looks too perfectly staged to be real. I think the perp is wearing a protective suit because his arms look really big, though he doesn't appear to be wearing anything on his head, so I just don't have a good feel for it. Also, the people who rush in seem to be too perfectly placed. I believe it's a training exercise.
The dog portion of it appears to be real though. That's one heck of a dog! I'm sure they expected him to go around the car and take the guy by the arm or leg. Training or no training, that dog deserves a T-bone and a cool bowl of water.
That reminds me of the punchline of an old joke: "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
In other words, it's a pretty big thing. For me, I refuse to buy her books after that.
But if you want more, I suppose that it's not a good thing to want someone to poison a Supreme Court Justice, or to blow up a building in Manhattan.
I am sorry.Apparently,I don’t have the recquisite knowlege on this subject.
I have and read most of her books and don’t remember her saying those things about seriously blowing up buildings in New York or poisoning a SCJ.
Please illuminate me.
Oh!Wait! Was that the NYT’s Building?
Count me in.(SARC)
Here's the excerpt from her book on the subject, in full context.
"One would hope that professional journalists wouldn't typically reprint Democratic talking points as news. More often, what professional journalists do is manufacture their own mock outrages against Republicans and then hand-deliver the fake scandal to the Democrats, who act dutifully shocked.
According to his devoted media claque, Obama was a victim of 'guilt by association' whenever anyone mentioned his two-decade association with a racist preacher or his ties to an unrepentant domestic terrorist. Being offended by 'guilt by association' was another new posture for liberals, who heretofore had specialized in making guilt-by-association charges.
Republican politicians who had given speeches to a conservative group, the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), were branded sympathizers of white supremacists because some of the directors of the CCC had, decades earlier, been leaders of a segregationist group, the Citizen councils of America, which were founded in 1954. There is no evidence on its Web page that the modern incarnation of the CCC supports segregation, though its "Statement of Principles" offers that the organization opposes "forced integration" and "efforts to mix the races of mankind.' But mostly the principles refer to subjects such as a strong national defense, the right to keep and bear arms, the traditional family, and an 'America First' trade policy.
Apart from some aggressive reporting on black-on-white crimes - the very crimes that are aggressively hidden by the establishment media - there is little on the CCC website suggesting that the group is a 'thinly veiled white supremacist' organization, as the New York Times calls it in one of its more charitable descriptions. At least the crimes reported on the CCC's Web page actually happened, as opposed to the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's claim that the U. S. government invented AIDS to kill blacks.
Republican Senator Trent Lott and Representative Bob Barr did nothing more than give speeches to the CCC, yet they were forever damned by their association with it. Neither man even belonged to the CCC, nor did they attend CCC meetings once a week for twenty years. They certainly didn't have their daughters baptized by CCC activists.
But according to the establishment media, Lott and Barr were fully responsible for the decades-old affiliations of some of the directors of a group...because they spoke at CCC. As the media's hysteria about the CCC reached a fever pitch, a Times editorial howled about 'fresh evidence of the persistence of racism' on the part of Lott based on his 'links to the white separatist group called the Council of Conservative Citzens.' The New York Times was shocked by the group's 'thinly veiled white supremacist agenda,' but was somewhat more accepting of the completely unveiled racism of Obama's preacher. One surmises that the CCC's thin veil of white supremacy would have become a bit thicker had Democratic congressman Dick Gephardt ever been a serious candidate for president. In the 1970's, he had spoken to a branch of the related, but more outre, Citizen Councils of America. That, and the fact that he's a preposterous boob, are probably the only two things that kept Dick Gephardt out of the White House.
After the initial flurry of articles, editorials, and news stories in the Times excitedly reporting that Barr had spoken to the CCC, Democratic representative Bob Wexler introduced a resolution in Congress for the sole purpose of denouncing the Council of Concerned Citizens. Other than the 9/11 terrorists, the CCC may be the only group ever singled out for denunciation in a congressional resolution. How about a resolution from Obama pom-pom girl Wexler on Obama's Trinity United Church of Christ?"
IBTZ!
Whether it was serious or not, it was a tacky and gross thing to say, especially less than a year after 2 skyscrapers in this city were blown up.
It’s in here, if you want to find it: http://www.observer.com/node/37827
Regardless of how her fans want to spin it, I no longer care to defend her or make excuses for her. She lost me when she spewed that anti-semitic crap about Jews needing to be “perfected.”
As for her “joke” about poisoning someone, here it is: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,183006,00.html and I don’t find it particularly clever or amusing.
That’s as stupid and offensive as some of the Worst of Coulter.
Thank you,Thank you,I have a million of them.
Apparently,you’ve missed the past 8 years of the love-fest that was directed towards our President and his lovely wife.
And you don’t really need to defend Ann.She’s perfectly capable of doing that herself.
Re-read that smarmy leftist clap-trap from the Observer
and see the respect they give Ann.
The leftist/socialists are the most hateful group of scum
we have here.
Sincerely,
Gigster
“THPPFFT!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.