Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2009 9:29:22 AM PST by slomark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: slomark

What are they scared of? Anyone who sanctions censorship deserves a cup of molten lead in their rectum.


2 posted on 02/08/2009 9:31:39 AM PST by Charles Bronson Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
"— and bring competition back to talk radio in Washington and elsewhere.”

Yea right.

3 posted on 02/08/2009 9:31:42 AM PST by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
“Maybe it’s time,” Press said in a Washington Post op-ed piece today, “to bring back the Fairness Doctrine

If newspapers had been so petty, small, and utterly partisan not so many decades ago, the vast majority of people would have laughed them to scorn.

there's a weird zombie-like acceptance of this stuff now. that's the thing that bugs me
4 posted on 02/08/2009 9:32:06 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
Liberal radio does not suffer from a lack of access. It suffers because it sucks. Who wants to listen to HATE 24/7?
5 posted on 02/08/2009 9:36:14 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Somewhere In Kenya, A Village Is Missing It's Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

Yea Bill,maybe it is time...


6 posted on 02/08/2009 9:36:20 AM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

Forget about censorship for a moment, this bill would be hugely anti-business when we desperately need more jobs.

Very few people will listen to liberal drivel so stations will have to lay off people to stay alive.

The way I see it government should stay out of business except to protect property rights and punish fraudsters.


7 posted on 02/08/2009 9:36:24 AM PST by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
Let's see if the lessons of Don Imus have been learned. How long before Limbaugh is “discovered” uttering some “hate speech”. It got him off the TV screen once.
8 posted on 02/08/2009 9:41:01 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
“Maybe it’s time...to bring competition back to talk radio in Washington and elsewhere.”

lol...only in the Orwellian world of commies like Press is "competition" defined as the gov't manipulating the free market and forcing radio stations to air Marxist propaganda.

9 posted on 02/08/2009 9:41:51 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

And after their ratings fail miserably, advertising dollars fall through and nobody still listens, they’ll start mandating that grocery stores, airports, workplaces etc pipe this left wing garbage over the speakers.


10 posted on 02/08/2009 9:43:59 AM PST by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

“— and bring competition back to talk radio in Washington and elsewhere.”

Elsewhere, huh? So I presume Press favors legally imposed ideological balance in academia, Hollywood, and big city newspapers? Or just in the sole medium in which conservatives have an edge?


11 posted on 02/08/2009 9:43:59 AM PST by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

What is just as interesting is another article linked on that website—the Senator who was pushing this on Bill Press Radio Show has HUSBAND who is AN EXEC @ failing Air America. Talk about a lack of fairness?!!!

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/senator-debbie-stabenow-fairness-doctrine-married-to-air-america-exec


12 posted on 02/08/2009 9:45:54 AM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

When liberals start referring to free speech as a “failed experiment”, I instinctively look over at my gun cabinet.


13 posted on 02/08/2009 9:48:31 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

This would be the bloody limit.


15 posted on 02/08/2009 9:49:54 AM PST by bergmeid (Watchin' Obrother self-destruct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

We need to go for the sound bite, catchy phrase etc. by ALWAYS referring to it as the UNfairness Doctrine.

Then if we do it often enough (Rush, Sean et al need to be doing it too) everytime they babble about the ‘Fairness’ Doctrine, the public will hear UNfairness.


16 posted on 02/08/2009 9:50:15 AM PST by Let's Roll (Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

Why is it so hard to spell REAGAN?


18 posted on 02/08/2009 10:07:25 AM PST by 1-Eagle (Tired of the Marxist Media? Visit Pajama TV (PJTV.com) for an enlightening experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
It funny that no one has had a problem with PBS and other public TV stations and their extreme left wing propaganda programming.
19 posted on 02/08/2009 10:08:37 AM PST by oldbrowser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

I think that Obama picking on Rush is a precursor to the Fairness Doctrine institution. He is defining the fight as one of patriotism. Rush (who said he would like to see Obama’s policies fail—of course—we all would) is attacked by Obama as wanting his unholiness to fail. Obama at the very beginning is setting up Rush as a bad guy to his syncophants and the sheeple so he can push this Soviet style speech repression through.

It’s also humerous to think that the uninformed left—the Obama voters even listen to the issues. A few haters do with their communist belief system. Note the cities where Press says that lefty radio is successful—Madison Wisconsin, Portland Oregon, etc. I’m sure its on the global warming station.

Also the DC station was called “Obama 1260”. Yeah, that’s “fair”. Imagine a station called “W 1260” or “What would Reagan do? 1260”. The owner of 1260 also owns successful 570 home of Laura Ingram and the Washington Redskins. He is looking for a profit not Radio Un-Free america.


21 posted on 02/08/2009 10:33:40 AM PST by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark
...bring competition back to talk radio...

Does this mean they want to force all the Chinese language stations to broadcast in Spanish, too? What good is airing diverse opinions if nobody can understand them?

-PJ

22 posted on 02/08/2009 10:37:24 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

Dem’s looking at the FD because of the “public airwaves”...ie govt control...

With the Old Dinasaures Newspapers falling like leaves....if/when the govt props them up, presumeable with ownership.....ala TARP........Fairness Doctrine to be applied there also?


24 posted on 02/08/2009 10:57:48 AM PST by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slomark

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2172649/posts

it is important not to let leftists frame the argument. ask the mod to put “censorship doctrine” in parentheses next to the title.


28 posted on 02/08/2009 1:27:03 PM PST by Chickensoup ("Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson