Posted on 12/15/2008 8:10:50 AM PST by STARWISE
The Supreme Court orders denied Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz application for staying the election as well as requesting that the Court would grant an injunction disallowing the Electoral College to hold its vote today until Barack Obama’s eligibility could be finally determined:
________________________
08A469
WROTNOWSKI, CORT V. BYSIEWICZ, CT SEC. OF STATE
The application for stay and/or injunction addressed
to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.
________________________
CitizenWells’ letter to the Electoral College
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/14/citizen-wells-letter-to-electors-electoral-college-uphold-us-constitution-december-15-2008-electors-vote-obama-is-not-eligible-demand-proof-2008-election-election-laws-political-party-pledges/
presents the next potential opportunity along the process of attempting to inform the nation about Barack Obama’s seeming ineligibility to serve in the office of the President.
Also, I have my thoughts on the next steps in this process.
A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
State-based initiatives for electoral reform can be found here.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1909
Naturally, this posting will be updated as circumstances warrant.
Update: CitizenWells isn’t happy about this decision at all. Read up on what he’s doing about it.
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-us-supreme-court-december-15-2008-justices-decide-cort-wrotnowski-versus-connecticut-secretary-of-state-bysiewicz-writ-of-mandamus-obama-not-eligible-stay-denied/
Update: InvestigatingObama’s question may be “asked and answered:” Is the Judicial Review Allowed Only After the Electoral College Vote?
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-judicial-review-allowed-only-after.html
Yes, I read it. I posted it the other day. But, the last sentence isn’t true. The qualifications can, and should, be challenged before the Electors convene...in the States. The Constitution does not say it When a State fails in it’s duty to protect the citizens, then the SCOTUS MUST act.
Which they have failed to do. Now, we will have a crisis if 0bama is inaugurated without this matter being settled, and then, at some later date, it comes to light that he is unqualified.
If a sitting President is found to have been unqualified for office at time of election, then every action and decision that President has made or taken must be undone.
If he is found, after being sworn in, to be unqualified, that the Vice-President becoming the President isn’t automatic, that Congress can intervene and make an appointment. They can also vote to keep the illegal bastard in office, as well.
We’re screwed.
Does that mean some one can sue Dick Cheney or Congress?
Thanks. I have fallen way behind on the Scotus stuff with the Chicago Thugocracy and Blago bling news stories coming out last week.
It would be so delicious for Cheney to file the first suit as a person with ‘standing’...lol. The leftist dems would go crazy!
The SCOTUS has only tossed the lawsuits to stay the EC from voting. Berg’s is still floating around and it addresses Obama’s BC. Keyes is in the pipeline too. Surrender before failure? Not me. Btw, do you know if the SCOTUS has the right to stop the EC from voting?
There is this post 90 that I've read on FR before. And there are still 2 cases in the pipeline, Berg's and Keyes.
Let's see for how long it stays up.
Meanwhile, my Townhall blog was listed 2nd on their Top Ten blog list. I haven't bothered to check it for the previous weeks. It could have been #1 for all I know.
It's not like we are plaguing the Supremes daily to help fix our issues, we only bother them on matters of nat. importance. To be totally ignored is judicial arrogance as far as I am concerned!!
Assuming they are not all senile or ignorant by now they know dam well what the issues are about a candidate that has hidden every thing there is to know about him and has played extremely fast and loose with the laws of the country.
The least they can do is force a valid BC to be submitted to the court if they have any guts whatsoever.
When does public opinion come into play with these clowns?
That is very encouraging! Thanks for the link to that post.
Of course they do. They can stop any action if they believe that-that action would be un-Constitutional and would cause harm if allowed to take place. They should have taken Berg’s case, as it would have allowed them to have some time to research, discuss, and decide. “Standing” is a BS excuse to use because you are afraid of the consequences. Now, they’ve put themselves up against a wall they’re scared to climb over.
They aren’t stupid. I’m pretty sure they know that 0bama is un-qualified by Citizenship to serve. They are hoping it just goes away and the sun will still come up tomorrow.
I mean, after all, we’ve bad Presidents before, how much harm can he do, anyway?
FOCA
RKBA
Global Warming
Equitable distribution of wealth
LOST
Bureaucratic regulation to equal a de facto Fairness Doctrine
Appointments to the SCOTUS
Ad infinitum
Oh, not much...
Sorry you are so easily confused. That ‘refutation’ is an Axelrod astroturfing effort to obfuscate the facts Polarik has highlighted accurately. ... Put another way, that is not a refutation just a piece of Obamanoid astroturf.
All Constitutional remedies have not been exhausted. Also Donofrio and Wrotnowski cases were not about forcing Obama to produce a BC. They were about the state vetting a candidate and stopping the EC from voting. When there are more Constitutional remedies, why would the court prematurely step in?
The point is-this needs to be addressed BEFORE the Congress certifies the votes.
The Senate Majority Leader, who is also the President pro tempore of the Senate, should have done due diligence. He didn’t. Each State should have done due diligence BEFORE allowing their votes to be certified. They didn’t. The DNC should have done due diligence. They didn’t.
The SCOTUS needs to address this issue BEFORE the votes are certified to prevent a Constitutional crisis.
Maryland, New Jersey, Illinois, and Hawaii are so far the only states to pass the legislation desired by Soros and friends.
I knew about Maryland and NJ, but not Illinois and Hawaii. How interesting.
Here's a 10/31/08 blog post on the subject that might be buried deep in the Google blog search:
The Electoral College is a living legacy of slavery and must be overturned in favor of a National Popular Vote. And instant run-off voting, in which voters rank their choices and it takes a majority rather than a plurality to win, can begin to break the strangle-hold of big party machines.
The blog? Bill Ayers. The logic? Non-existent. (And no, I won't link it.)
A freeper posted on a thread awhile back that he emailed his Rep and he intends to object on the grounds that Obama isn't qualified. We'll see.
Surrender before failure?
~~~~
Right! We fight on !
It’s like I’ve been posting all along...
The problem is...
—
Bush and the Bush Administration wants nothing to do with this issue, Vice President Cheney wants nothing to do or say about this issue, McCain and his previous campaign wants nothing to do with this issue, Governor Palin wants nothing to do with this issue and is looking forward to working with Obama, the Republican Party wants nothing to do with this issue, even Rush Limbaugh wants nothing to do with this issue, many other conservative websites want nothing to do with this issue, many here on Free Republic want nothing to do with this issue — and (of course) — the Democrats want nothing to do with this issue, along with Obama wanting nothing to do with this issue. Even the FBI wants nothing to do with it...
—
When you can get none of your own people in positions of authority to do something about the issue, you are *dead in the water*... And that’s the way it is right now...
And now — today — US Supreme Court — “Denied...” (with *no comment*)
This “election” was a done deal from way back when. It turned out exactly as the people behind the scenes wanted it to. At 12:00 January 20, 2009 obama will assume power. So long as he does the bidding of his masters he will remain power.
I, personally, do not believe that he is qualified according to the Constitution but what I think or do not think does not matter. I cannot change it.
The Constitutional Representive Republic died when most of its citizens became too sorry to read and understand theur Constitution.
November 4, 2008 was the funeral.
In time the American people will pay a high price for their stupidity.
Are you going to spam post this on every thread without reading the info in the thread?
I read the info... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.