Yes, I read it. I posted it the other day. But, the last sentence isn’t true. The qualifications can, and should, be challenged before the Electors convene...in the States. The Constitution does not say it When a State fails in it’s duty to protect the citizens, then the SCOTUS MUST act.
Which they have failed to do. Now, we will have a crisis if 0bama is inaugurated without this matter being settled, and then, at some later date, it comes to light that he is unqualified.
If a sitting President is found to have been unqualified for office at time of election, then every action and decision that President has made or taken must be undone.
If he is found, after being sworn in, to be unqualified, that the Vice-President becoming the President isn’t automatic, that Congress can intervene and make an appointment. They can also vote to keep the illegal bastard in office, as well.
We’re screwed.
The SCOTUS has only tossed the lawsuits to stay the EC from voting. Berg’s is still floating around and it addresses Obama’s BC. Keyes is in the pipeline too. Surrender before failure? Not me. Btw, do you know if the SCOTUS has the right to stop the EC from voting?