[DJ MacWoW]

The SCOTUS has only tossed the lawsuits to stay the EC from voting. Berg’s is still floating around and it addresses Obama’s BC. Keyes is in the pipeline too. Surrender before failure? Not me. Btw, do you know if the SCOTUS has the right to stop the EC from voting?

[papasmurf]

Of course they do. They can stop any action if they believe that-that action would be un-Constitutional and would cause harm if allowed to take place. They should have taken Berg’s case, as it would have allowed them to have some time to research, discuss, and decide. “Standing” is a BS excuse to use because you are afraid of the consequences. Now, they’ve put themselves up against a wall they’re scared to climb over.

They aren’t stupid. I’m pretty sure they know that 0bama is un-qualified by Citizenship to serve. They are hoping it just goes away and the sun will still come up tomorrow.

I mean, after all, we’ve bad Presidents before, how much harm can he do, anyway?

FOCA
RKBA
Global Warming
Equitable distribution of wealth
LOST
Bureaucratic regulation to equal a de facto Fairness Doctrine
Appointments to the SCOTUS
Ad infinitum

Oh, not much...

[papasmurf]

BTW, Article I Section 5 of the Constitution...
Qualifications of it's own members.

So, now we have the Senate responsible for NOT vetting 0bama as a Senator, to begin with.

In Cheney's case, I don't know if he can issue a valid challenge. The challenge must come after a States' vote is read, and then challenged by one Senator and one Representative of that State.

[STARWISE]

Surrender before failure?

~~~~

Right! We fight on !