Of course they do. They can stop any action if they believe that-that action would be un-Constitutional and would cause harm if allowed to take place. They should have taken Berg’s case, as it would have allowed them to have some time to research, discuss, and decide. “Standing” is a BS excuse to use because you are afraid of the consequences. Now, they’ve put themselves up against a wall they’re scared to climb over.
They aren’t stupid. I’m pretty sure they know that 0bama is un-qualified by Citizenship to serve. They are hoping it just goes away and the sun will still come up tomorrow.
I mean, after all, we’ve bad Presidents before, how much harm can he do, anyway?
FOCA
RKBA
Global Warming
Equitable distribution of wealth
LOST
Bureaucratic regulation to equal a de facto Fairness Doctrine
Appointments to the SCOTUS
Ad infinitum
Oh, not much...
All Constitutional remedies have not been exhausted. Also Donofrio and Wrotnowski cases were not about forcing Obama to produce a BC. They were about the state vetting a candidate and stopping the EC from voting. When there are more Constitutional remedies, why would the court prematurely step in?