Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NO CUSSING - HE'S NOT KIDDING
Roman Around ^ | 6 December 2008 | Andrew Roman

Posted on 12/06/2008 10:58:49 AM PST by andrew roman

Depending on where you land on this issue, this is either a judge who is abusing power by miscarrying justice, or he is a judge who absolutely rules (both figuratively and literally).

I could venture out on a limb and say that opinions here probably - I say probably - break along political lines in principal.

zzz

However, in this case, I think the debate should rightly focus on degree.

It is certainly up for debate.

Either way, this is one jurist who really doesn't take a lot of (expletive) in his courtroom.

He's not quite a hanging judge, but close enough.

Ohio Judge Robert Ruehlman, for the second time in as many days, has thrown the book at someone for swearing in his courtroom.

From Cincinnati.com:

It was an accused gang member Wednesday. On Thursday, it was a private attorney in a non-criminal case.

(Michael) Brautigam, who is an attorney but isn't licensed in Ohio, asked Ruehlman for more time to file documents. Ruehlman gave it to him. As (Peter) Koenig (Cincinnati attorney) and Brautigam turned to walk away from the judge, Brautigam called Koenig "a (bleeping) liar."

"He used the famous F-word," Koenig said. "(Ruehlman) asked Mr. Brautigam if he said that."

Brautigam admitted he had and had directed it at Koenig.

Ruehlman cited Brautigam for contempt and sent him to jail for six months.

Six months!

Holy steel tomatoes, Batman!

Just the day before, Jamel Sechrest, member of a street gang known as the "Taliband," got six months for a double cuss in Ruehlman's court.

My Lord ... I'm afraid to find out what happens if you break wind in his presence. A weekend at hard labor? Nipple electrodes?

"Judge Ruehlman absolutely did the right thing by attempting to maintain order, civility and decorum in his courtroom. Attorney Brautigam has been discourteous and disrespectful to judges, lawyers and litigants in our community on more than one occasion," Koenig said.

Opinions run the gamut here, as some of the comments from Cincinnati.com readers suggest:

- How can any one with an ounce of common sense agree with this? What fair about causing a man to lose pay and possibly his home because he's "doing time" for using the "F" word in court, while talking to and about another attorney? ... He has prove (sic) that intellegence (sic) is not a prerequisite to being a Judge. He has brought shame to this "profession". Shame on you Judge Foolishman.

- This judge absolutely rocks! So many people, from gang losers to lawyers, and so on, have no respect for anything or anyone anymore. Yeah, 6 months may be extreme, but at least he has the resolve and balls to do something about it in this PC, bleeding heart, excusxe riddin, no-accountability society! Keep on keepin on judge!!

Opinions out there?

Anyone who stands up for steadfast societal standards and is willing to defend those values - including not tolerating inappropriate language - gets a great big arm-waving "woo hoo" from me.

I'm not exactly sure half-a-year is the right punishment for an F-bomb, but I love this judge's style a whole hell of alot.

Dammit, I meant heck of alot.

Damn, I meant darn it.

_


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: contemptofcourt; cussing; cussingincourt; principalprinciple; profanity; robertruehlman

1 posted on 12/06/2008 10:58:51 AM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Well, he ~did~ warn them....:)


2 posted on 12/06/2008 11:02:26 AM PST by Salamander (Blue Oyster Cult: The soundtrack for the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

I think the judge is right on.

Cursing in the court IS disrespectful.


3 posted on 12/06/2008 11:02:49 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Re: “Please do not swear!”

Soooo, what happens if you say “No!” when the bailiff asks: “Do you swear to tell the truth...?”


4 posted on 12/06/2008 11:05:12 AM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle
Soooo, what happens if you say “No!” when the bailiff asks: “Do you swear to tell the truth...?”

The judge might ask you to affirm instead.

5 posted on 12/06/2008 11:07:41 AM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Six months for swearing is cruel and unusual. Put him in jail for gang activity.


6 posted on 12/06/2008 11:09:16 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

I’ve long believed that cursing is a crutch of a conversational cripple.

The judge warned. The curser should have taken personal responsibility and respect for the court more seriously. There are consequences to ill behavior.


7 posted on 12/06/2008 11:09:46 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman
I support this. I would imagine that after just a few instances, everybody who walks into the judge's courtroom would be saying to one another -- "Remember: DON'T swear. No matter what happens. Just DON'T."

And at that point, we probably won't be hearing about these "terrible" six month sentences any more.

8 posted on 12/06/2008 11:16:05 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman; Larry Lucido; sit-rep

The charge was contempt of court....not cussing. Judges control their courts , gang banging punks or liberal arrogant idiots with no respect don’t. Judges are there as impartial individual that let you present your case and to attack them just makes it harder for the judge to do so. That is primary reason for your honor versus “f*cker” !

At least that is what Sit Rep told me .......:o)


9 posted on 12/06/2008 11:32:23 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

I’m with the judge. Like the “president elect” says; words mean things.


10 posted on 12/06/2008 11:32:28 AM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

“Just Damn...”


11 posted on 12/06/2008 11:42:47 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman
"He used the famous F-word," Koenig said. "(Ruehlman) asked Mr. Brautigam if he said that." Brautigam admitted he had and had directed it at Koenig. Ruehlman cited Brautigam for contempt and sent him to jail for six months.

" ... the queen mother of dirty words. The f--- word ..."

12 posted on 12/06/2008 12:26:50 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

Six months seems a bit excessive. A weekend would seem more appropriate.

In most of these cases, the judge lets them sweat for a while, and then gives one chance to make an abject apology.


13 posted on 12/06/2008 12:32:51 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andrew roman

14 posted on 12/06/2008 1:11:08 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

lmao...


15 posted on 12/06/2008 4:25:26 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson