Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/06/2008 10:58:51 AM PST by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: andrew roman

Well, he ~did~ warn them....:)


2 posted on 12/06/2008 11:02:26 AM PST by Salamander (Blue Oyster Cult: The soundtrack for the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

I think the judge is right on.

Cursing in the court IS disrespectful.


3 posted on 12/06/2008 11:02:49 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Re: “Please do not swear!”

Soooo, what happens if you say “No!” when the bailiff asks: “Do you swear to tell the truth...?”


4 posted on 12/06/2008 11:05:12 AM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Six months for swearing is cruel and unusual. Put him in jail for gang activity.


6 posted on 12/06/2008 11:09:16 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

I’ve long believed that cursing is a crutch of a conversational cripple.

The judge warned. The curser should have taken personal responsibility and respect for the court more seriously. There are consequences to ill behavior.


7 posted on 12/06/2008 11:09:46 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
I support this. I would imagine that after just a few instances, everybody who walks into the judge's courtroom would be saying to one another -- "Remember: DON'T swear. No matter what happens. Just DON'T."

And at that point, we probably won't be hearing about these "terrible" six month sentences any more.

8 posted on 12/06/2008 11:16:05 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman; Larry Lucido; sit-rep

The charge was contempt of court....not cussing. Judges control their courts , gang banging punks or liberal arrogant idiots with no respect don’t. Judges are there as impartial individual that let you present your case and to attack them just makes it harder for the judge to do so. That is primary reason for your honor versus “f*cker” !

At least that is what Sit Rep told me .......:o)


9 posted on 12/06/2008 11:32:23 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

I’m with the judge. Like the “president elect” says; words mean things.


10 posted on 12/06/2008 11:32:28 AM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

“Just Damn...”


11 posted on 12/06/2008 11:42:47 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
"He used the famous F-word," Koenig said. "(Ruehlman) asked Mr. Brautigam if he said that." Brautigam admitted he had and had directed it at Koenig. Ruehlman cited Brautigam for contempt and sent him to jail for six months.

" ... the queen mother of dirty words. The f--- word ..."

12 posted on 12/06/2008 12:26:50 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Six months seems a bit excessive. A weekend would seem more appropriate.

In most of these cases, the judge lets them sweat for a while, and then gives one chance to make an abject apology.


13 posted on 12/06/2008 12:32:51 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

14 posted on 12/06/2008 1:11:08 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson