Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh)
Israel Insider ^ | 3 July 2008 | Reuven Koret

Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 9,661-9,665 next last
To: Calpernia; BIGLOOK; Enchante; Ernest_at_the_Beach; PhilDragoo; ASA Vet

Data like this is why the left wing lawyers killed Able Danger.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,165414,00.html


1,161 posted on 07/04/2008 10:55:53 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (America's Mugabe, the Obamination.will bring Mugabe Change to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1158 | View Replies]

To: txflake
Obama sure flew a lot for a child who can’t produce a legitimate birth certificate.

His mother would have had an up to date passport on which the son, probably known as Barry Dunham, and later adopted as Soetoro, would have been included. Minor children don't require their own passports, do they?

It's not the existence of a birth certificate as such that we are discussing, I'm sure he has one somewhere...but until he produces it, regardless of what it reveals, (perhaps his name really is/was Barry Dunham and his parents were not married?)the questions will continue.

The COLB posted on the fightthesmears website just makes things worse. I have better documentation for my pedigreed dogs!

I was also adopted, granted it was a long time ago, I travelled from Germany to Australia on my stepfather's passport - and because of the adoption, I became POLISH, taking the nationality of the adoptive parent.

This opens up a whole new can of worms. Obama just might be Indonesian...and hold a dual Indonesian/American passport. One lie just leads to another...

1,162 posted on 07/04/2008 10:58:21 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

“It’s 8 weeks ‘til the convention. Forged doc’s, illegal contributions, flip-flops...I dunno.”

As of yesterday, The Obamination had probably 99.9999 % of the mediots the MSM elites in his pocket. So he could get by with fraud, lies, flip flopping and nothing would be said or done.

When Mo Dowd puts out data like this instead of attacking GW, something is happening.


1,163 posted on 07/04/2008 10:59:32 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (America's Mugabe, the Obamination.will bring Mugabe Change to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; davandbar; Allegra
While the ChiComs may be playing a part in the Bundling scheme, other players probably bankroll the largest part.

Think $140/bbl oil.

This has been approved by the DNC and the Obama for President campaign. There is no need to send in contributions.....we'll do it for you!
1,164 posted on 07/04/2008 11:00:04 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

“Think $140/bbl oil.

This has been approved by the DNC and the Obama for President campaign. There is no need to send in contributions.....we’ll do it for you! “

Absolutely, I was trying not to think about it tonight.

The Opecker Thugs and Princes who fund Iran’s serial killers could easily fund the Obamination with just a percent of the price increases per barrel in the past year.


1,165 posted on 07/04/2008 11:04:19 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (America's Mugabe, the Obamination.will bring Mugabe Change to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1164 | View Replies]

To: davandbar; BIGLOOK; SE Mom; Allegra; Fred Nerks

Thanks for posting this information.

I’m getting ready to hit the sack.

Would you or Big Look or someone post Mo’s article as a stand alone thread and ping those of us who have commnented your reply re Mo.

Then we can ping our mail lists to ensure that others get to see this. Otherwise it will probably die over the 3 day weekend.

Thanks


1,166 posted on 07/04/2008 11:09:27 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (America's Mugabe, the Obamination.will bring Mugabe Change to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies]

To: ameagle
Barack Obama, aged about 10, with his mother Ann and father Barack Senior, celebrating Christmas in Hawaii.

At age 10, Barry was celebrating Christmas with his Mother and father. We must concede, it doesn't look very Islamic.

1,167 posted on 07/04/2008 11:10:15 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1129 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

He very well might be legally Indonesian.

I frankly do not recall a prior election where we cannot discern the nationality or eligibility of a candidate for POTUS.

And where such candidate presents a fraudulent birth certificate.


1,168 posted on 07/04/2008 11:13:09 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; pissant; SE Mom; TomasUSMC

Maureen Dowd attacks Obama bump.


1,169 posted on 07/04/2008 11:15:19 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...

:-(


1,170 posted on 07/04/2008 11:18:18 PM PDT by DietCoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
I know what MuMu's look like. I wore one of them also. This is not a MuMu.


This is a typical maternity top of the 60's.

1,171 posted on 07/04/2008 11:23:08 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies]

To: txflake
One website states: Stanley Ann Dunham married in 1960 and that in 1967 Barrack Obama was 3 years old.

If Barrack Obama was 3 in 1967 then he would have been born in 1964. Another site claims that Obama is 46 years old now. So how could he have been born in 1964? 2008-1964=44 years old. So how can articles claim that he is 46 years old when he should be 44 years old by his date of birth?

Article giving state of birth: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/blog/tag/Stanley%20Ann%20Durham%20Soetoro/page/1/default.aspx

Article stating his age: http://news-lanka.blogspot.com/2008/06/senator-barrack-obama-clinches.html

Looks like he was born sooner than claimed in the article unless they are lying about his age or are confused.

1,172 posted on 07/04/2008 11:26:09 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies]

To: DietCoke

Thanks. Check out the age discrepancy problem I have noted in post 1172. The timeline they are giving doesn’t jive with his age. He can’t be both 44 and 46 years old. Simple math.


1,173 posted on 07/04/2008 11:31:06 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1142 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

If Obama is 46 years old as articles state he would have had to have been born in 1962, not 1964. 2008-46=1962. Which is it? A lot of explaining to do here!?!?


1,174 posted on 07/04/2008 11:35:42 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: DietCoke; davandbar; SunkenCiv; txflake

“I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...”

I think you might be right about that...it doesn’t appear on her page:

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/maureendowd/index.html

This might be the source:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/7e603b4929b2d98c


1,175 posted on 07/04/2008 11:43:01 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1170 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Birth certificate on the LA Times blog site says that he was born in 1961? If so how could he have been 3 in 1967 as the other article claims. He would have been 6 years old, not 3 in 1967 if he was indeed born in 1961. So how can the article claim that he was 3 in 1967. Could be a mistake by the journalist, don’t know.


1,176 posted on 07/04/2008 11:43:08 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1174 | View Replies]

To: davandbar
WOW, just WOW. I've posted about this issue several times since Obambi began announcing huge "Internet" based fundraising but I have not seen any definite info on it. It is absolutely insane that there are so few controls on how foreign-based money can now flood into our political system, especially if it comes from psychotic totalitarian regimes that mean us ill. Communist China, Iran, Saudi Arabia..... our political system is being bought by these scumbags but the libs and RINOs are worried about eviiiilll US corporations. OF COURSE those govts love Obambi, he is a squishy little leftist weasel and they know they can walk all over him; or worse.

So while the idiotic, anti-Constitutional "McCain-Feingold" legislation was passed and signed into law the doors were wide open to unlimited foreign financial manipulations of our electoral system. Just let the PRC or Iran et al program enough "small contributions" and they can flood the coffers of any anti-American candidate like Obambi. What can be done about this nightmare?

================================================

"While the security people were not able to track most of the sources due to firewalls and other blocking devices put on these contributions they were able to collate the number of contributions that were coming in seemingly from individuals but the funds were from only a few credit card accounts and bank electronic funds transfers. The internet service providers (ISP) they were able to trace were from Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries. One of the banks used for fund transfers was also located in Saudi Arabia."

"Another concentrated group of donations was traced to a Chinese ISP with a similar pattern of limited credit card charges."

1,177 posted on 07/04/2008 11:43:17 PM PDT by Enchante (OBAMA: "That's not the Wesley Clark I knew!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Should read article giving Obama's date of birth as 1964, not 1961, 1961 is on the "certificate" at least the one linked from the LA Times blog.

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/blog/tag/Stanley%20Ann%20Durham%20Soetoro/page/1/default.aspx

1,178 posted on 07/04/2008 11:46:13 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
This other article implies he was born in 1964 which doesn't jove with the LA Times blog certificate date of 1961.

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/blog/tag/Stanley%20Ann%20Durham%20Soetoro/page/1/default.aspx

It states he was 3 in the picture in 1967. 1967-3=1964.

1,179 posted on 07/04/2008 11:48:48 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1178 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Should read doesn’t jive, not doesn’t jove.


1,180 posted on 07/04/2008 11:49:58 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 9,661-9,665 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson