[txhurl]

Maureen Dowd attacks Obama bump.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

One website states: Stanley Ann Dunham married in 1960 and that in 1967 Barrack Obama was 3 years old.

If Barrack Obama was 3 in 1967 then he would have been born in 1964. Another site claims that Obama is 46 years old now. So how could he have been born in 1964? 2008-1964=44 years old. So how can articles claim that he is 46 years old when he should be 44 years old by his date of birth?

Article giving state of birth: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/blog/tag/Stanley%20Ann%20Durham%20Soetoro/page/1/default.aspx

Article stating his age: http://news-lanka.blogspot.com/2008/06/senator-barrack-obama-clinches.html

Looks like he was born sooner than claimed in the article unless they are lying about his age or are confused.

[pissant]

Obama needs to be exposed. If MoDo is the only one at the Times willing to do it, then great. She’s got more balls than David Brooks anyway.