[DietCoke]

I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...

:-(

[Fred Nerks]

“I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...”

I think you might be right about that...it doesn’t appear on her page:

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/maureendowd/index.html

This might be the source:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/7e603b4929b2d98c

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for the warning:

I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...

:-(

[Grampa Dave]

It is amazing how fast Freepers can identify and sort out bad info.

The first reply re the apparently false MoDo article was posted:

1,140 posted on Friday, July 04, 2008 10:31:35 PM by davandbar

Diet Coke posted the first warning that the article is probably bonus : 1,170 posted on Friday, July 04, 2008 11:18:18 PM by DietCoke

I’m guessing that the Maureen Dowd article is bogus. It doesn’t match up with her June 29th column in the NYT...

:-(

1,170 posted on Friday, July 04, 2008 11:18:18 PM by DietCoke

In less than an hour, DietCoke and then others did their fact finding and found out the article was probably phoney, and posted that the article was not to be trusted..

Compare that to the other site that has been running the bad Certificate of Birth for a very long time inspite of countless challenges that COB is a pos.

At least the Kerry site in 2004 had thugs monitoring Free Republic, and when we caught them posting lies and worse on Kerry’s site. They quickly removed those lies.

So are Obaminations internet thugs dumb or just so PC, they don’t care about leaving bs on their sites like the phoney COB of Obamination?