Birth certificate on the LA Times blog site says that he was born in 1961? If so how could he have been 3 in 1967 as the other article claims. He would have been 6 years old, not 3 in 1967 if he was indeed born in 1961. So how can the article claim that he was 3 in 1967. Could be a mistake by the journalist, don’t know.
http://www.mydamnchannel.com/blog/tag/Stanley%20Ann%20Durham%20Soetoro/page/1/default.aspx