Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calling Wolves "Sheep": A respectful disagreement
Thermonuclear Thought ^ | 22 April 08 | Me

Posted on 04/22/2008 12:46:48 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback


Carolyn Jessop, who escaped from an FLDS marriage that included 6 other wives and 54 children.


Rulon Jeffs, 90, poses with two of his brides approximately two years before his death. Reported estimates of the number of his wives range from 19 to 75. His son, Warren, succeeded him as Prophet of the FLDS.



I have to say, I'm more than a little disturbed how many conservatives I'm coming across who believe that the FLDS folks from the YFZ ranch in Texas have been on the receiving end of another Waco, or something resembling the Elian Gonzalez abduction. Though of course I consider the adults at the ranch to be innocent until proven guilty, I believe that the facts available show the authorities made the right call on this one as far as seeking a warrant and taking temporary custody goes.

Let's put the FLDS aside for a moment, and consider MS-13. Through numerous court findings and testimony of victims and former members, MS-13 can be regarded without doubt as a criminal enterprise. One of their specialties is human trafficking. Now, imagine a young woman has called police from a cell phone, describing herself as one of the slaves MS-13 brings into the country. Imagine that when she describes her location the police recognize it as a known meeting place and suspected "processing center" for the gang. Imagine also that these same police know that a major MS-13 leader has recently been convicted of multiple counts related to setting up the human trafficking network in the first place.

If you're a cop, do you go get a warrant and raid the place? I sure would!

Some readers may be offended that I have compared a religious commune to a gang so vicious they pretty much qualify as a terrorist organization. My point is not that the FLDS is as dangerous as MS-13. That wouldn't be true if everything they're accused of is true several times over. No, my point is that they are both known criminal enterprises. One of them just happens to also be a religion.

Sure, the FLDS is a faith community, but an essential part of their faith practice--a part as important to them as confession is to a Catholic and keeping kosher is to an Orthodox Jew--is the "spiritual marriage" of multiple women to one or more men, usually starting at an age well below the age of consent. Given what has been revealed in court at Warren Jeffs' trial and the testimony of numerous people who've left the FLDS (see the "True Stories" section at systematic abuse of boys as well.

Unless the FLDS goes through a doctrinal change far more sweeping than the change Mormons went through when they gave up their doctrines of polygamy and racial supremacy, it will remain a criminal organization, dedicated to committing sex crimes because they believe these sex crimes are God's preferred way to build families. Does that mean they should be broken up? No, a religion is a religion, and their Constitutional protections prevent that. But as long as every outward sign points to them engaging in horrific illegal acts as part of their religious practice, there will be a lot of opportunity for probable cause.

It could be that the state is way out of line, and we'll find that out at trial with a lot of acquittals and fat lawsuits against Texas to follow. But I think there was enough probable cause here for two or three cases.

I have four more issues with what Scott wrote, the first two of which are points he made that I've seen expressed by other conservatives:

1. I'm concerned about members of the Christian, conservative or homeschooling communities treating polygamy as no big deal. It's true that some heroes of the faith were polygamists, but it's also true that I can't recall one of them who didn't suffer. David, Solomon, Jacob...each had misery, and Solomon was even drawn away from worshipping God because of influence from his multiple wives. Moreover, there is an opppressive aspect to the FLDS's activities that I'm certain wasn't present in any home run by someone who was called "a man after God's own heart." FLDS women are basically chattel. That's why I don't see polygamy as practiced by these folks as being superior or even equal to being raised in a homosexual environment. "Heather Has Two Mommies" and "Heather has Eight Mommies and a Daddy Who Can't Remember Her Name" both seem like bad news to me.

2. The idea being advanced that only certain girls (the pregnant teens) or only the female children should have been taken into custody is way, way off. Either every child should have been removed or not a single one should have been removed. If this ranch was what the state claims it was, every adult there was was involved in or knew about a conspiracy to commit serial child sexual abuse. In other words, either the state is lying or there's not a single adult there who should have custody of a child.

Would you let a babysitter care for your son if he told you he had been convicted of child sexual abuse, but was only interested in girls? Neither should a parent who allowed abuse of young girls be considered a fit guardian for young boys.

3. The argument that God saw fit to open these women's wombs so we should trust His judgment is not Bbiblically sustainable, and I know from personal experience that it's flawed. Consider that God also opened the wombs of the women who sacrificed their infant children to Molech, so the mere existence of a child doesn't mean the child will be welcomed and cared for properly. My great-grandmother's womb was opened so she could have my peternal grandfather, and he and at least one of his brothers were so badly abused that they spent time in mental institutions. Both of these men performed heroically in WWII and one was even offered a battlefield commission. They deserved better than to have parents who abused them.

4. Scott, you called Madonna "beautiful and a whore." I have to strongly disagree with that description. For once I am in agreement with the editors of Maxim, who referred to Madonna as "Willem Dafoe with hot flashes." :-)

Of course we have to watch our government, but we need to be careful about when we start yelling "SHEEP!" We might just be enabling a pack of wolves.


TOPICS: Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: silverback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
This is my response to this post by my blog partner Scott.

Sorry I haven't posted one of these in awhile, but lately I've been posting a lot of links and videos, and it seemed like empty bandwidth use if i posted them at FR.

If anyone wants on my blog ping list, say so here or by freepmail.

1 posted on 04/22/2008 12:46:48 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 1lawlady; afraidfortherepublic; aragona; arthurus; BlessedBeGod; BlessedByLiberty; ...

Silverback's blog ping!

If anyone wants on or off my blog ping list, please notify me here or by freepmail.

2 posted on 04/22/2008 12:48:15 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Wasn’t Elian Gonzales here illegally?


3 posted on 04/22/2008 12:56:17 PM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

You are spot on. This cult is ran by perverted old men who get off on sexual perversion and power. They are pure evil who have twisted the minds of too many people. A society who tolerates this behavior is doomed.


4 posted on 04/22/2008 1:01:32 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Wasn’t Elian Gonzales here illegally?

That was the matter at dispute in court, but even if he was illegal and in the wrong custody there was nothing to justify a raid by guys with machine guns.

I note for the record that I oppose the legal standard used in the U.S. where you have to make it to dry land before you are considered to be here legally. As far as I'm concerned, if you make the effort and get rescued, you should be welcomed.

5 posted on 04/22/2008 1:04:31 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

You’re correct, but let’s not be too hard on those who disagree. This case has many similarities to some really disturbing incidents of overzealousness and worse by law enforcement, so it reminds them of those tragedies. This ranch reminds me of the Branch Davidiaan compound in a lot of ways.


6 posted on 04/22/2008 1:09:01 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Cubans are considered refugees. We can send them back if intercepted, but if they make it to dry land they are O.K.


7 posted on 04/22/2008 1:10:14 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? ((Ok, Im the official Pit Bull Defender/If you can't stand behind our troops, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
2. The idea being advanced that only certain girls (the pregnant teens) or only the female children should have been taken into custody is way, way off. Either every child should have been removed or not a single one should have been removed. If this ranch was what the state claims it was, every adult there was was involved in or knew about a conspiracy to commit serial child sexual abuse. In other words, either the state is lying or there's not a single adult there who should have custody of a child.

I do not buy this line. Would be nice but life is not so simple as this.
8 posted on 04/22/2008 1:11:38 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood
I do not buy this line. Would be nice but life is not so simple as this.

Could you elaborate? Is it your contention that the average mom at YFZ didn't know that her daughters would be expected to enter into arranged marriages?

9 posted on 04/22/2008 1:14:28 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: microgood
Perhaps it would help if the FLDS was defined not as a church or a cult but as organized crime. That's what it is. Obviously not the children, not all the women, but the "leadership" and most of the adult -mature- males and females.

They have brainwashed the children for generations to get them to go along with the program and they have rewarded those who have done so.

10 posted on 04/22/2008 1:18:19 PM PDT by oneolcop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I merely pointed out that I wasn't so sure there was a big difference between one man having children with several women (which is supposed to be such a horrible thing) and the occurrence I see daily in our practice of one woman with numerous children by different fathers (which we are supposed to accept without seeming to notice). We seem to have a double standard here. That is all I am saying. I certainly do not condone polygamy and agree the Bible certainly doesn't support it and have had my own back and forth with Mormons here (I am Southern Baptist so you can imagine how that went...)
11 posted on 04/22/2008 1:18:25 PM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

“It is good to be the Prophet”


12 posted on 04/22/2008 1:19:17 PM PDT by stockpirate (Obamaicans, RNC's RINO Chickens............coming ......home..... to roost................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

This time no buildings were destroyed and burned, and no people were killed. The government invaded a cult in Texas using brute force, there is the similarity. It was done correctly, and it was done for a good lawful and moral reason. The defenders of this cult have it all screwed up. The people invloved in the FLDS are brainwashed into believing this sick way of life is good. There is no good there.


13 posted on 04/22/2008 1:29:52 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Could you elaborate? Is it your contention that the average mom at YFZ didn't know that her daughters would be expected to enter into arranged marriages?

I think the issue is not arranged marriages but underage pregancies. I think it is clear that many people at this compound do not know what outside society's version of normal is. I guess you can say they should have known but I've always considered that argument weak. I think that many of these women have no reference point outside of the compound from which to judge the activities inside.
14 posted on 04/22/2008 1:38:03 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: microgood

You posted, “I think it is clear that many people at this compound do not know what outside society’s version of normal is.”

This is my point, I don’t think many freepers know what outside society’s definition of normal is.


15 posted on 04/22/2008 1:43:59 PM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

“Would the government dare to raid a Latino or Black housing project and remove the children wholesale?”

I think that is an interesting concept. There is much abuse that goes on in disfunctional homes where values of right and wrong are not taught. Housing projects for the most part have become nothing more then breeding grounds for antisocial behavior. The abuse that occurs in such situations must be horrific. It is interesting how the government choses to ignore that and makes the claim that people have the right to live alternative life-styles. But do parents have the right to live sexually deviant lives or morally depraved lives ruled by drug addiction when they are raising children? It only screws up the children, requiring government intervention when these children show up in the public school system. Yet no one can address the parents disfunctional life-style of government dependency with all of it’s ugly reprecussions of a life lived without any consequences, because after all, big daddy, the government is paying all the bills.


16 posted on 04/22/2008 1:44:12 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Now imagine that the local authorities have been just waiting for and anticipating any excuse to get into this compound. Then take it one step further and imagine how over zealous they were when a tiny unverified and unresearched crack appeared.
I think that there are a lot of people wondering if somehow the local storm troopers didn't figure out a way to initiate the totally bogus and fake call them selves. Local LE are the only ones in this whole situation who got exactly what they wanted!!! I hate the thought of child rape but this whole story started in a lie and has led to the court sponsored kidnap of over 400 children.
One thing is a for sure conclusion. the next time the cops in Texas knock on the door of one of these compounds they will be met with violence. They have made it quite clear that they residents of any communal living alternate belief system have nothing to loose by putting up a fight. The just found out they have everything to loose by letting Law Enforcement in the front door. They have learned that anyone can call from any location and tell a lie and then based on that lie without any verification or research that their children can be taken from them without any physical proof of any wrongdoing on their part. Should we all be very happy that the great state of Texas has taught so many of us so much????
17 posted on 04/22/2008 1:47:03 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood
I think that many of these women have no reference point outside of the compound from which to judge the activities inside.

I see, and you make a good point. That would, however, mean they were just as unqualified to be a guardian as someone who knew those standards and violated them anyway.

18 posted on 04/22/2008 1:54:10 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
"The people involved in the FLDS are brainwashed into believing this sick way of life is good. There is no good there."

Good point, I hate to say it, but even the women seem a little perverted, despite their ridiculous attempt at going overboard to appear overly modest. What a weird group, the women must dress like they are living in the 1800's while the men behave like sexual hounds that would make Hugh Hefner blush. I don't get it, the only thing that I can think is that they are one kinky group of people. They must be stopped, children should not pay for their perverted lifestyle, which by the way would qualify as being an alternative lifestyle according to the radical left.

19 posted on 04/22/2008 1:56:01 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: microgood
If you believe that underage pregnancy is the point of preven guilt on the part of the parents then you must support that that guilt applies to each and every parent who have an underage daughter who ends up pregnant. They took all the children and yet they do not even claim that all of the children were abused or harmed. Are we now going to vilify a religion because we don't agree with what they believe even before we have any proof of wrong doing??? Are we willing to castrate parents of their parental rights even before an allegation of abuse or harm has been made??? This thing totally stinks from any point of view that accepts that we are a nation ruled by laws. This whole situation is a knee jerk reaction that was caused by a lie. People need to start asking themselves the quest of why did the local authorities believe this lie without any attempt of verification. It seems to me that they just couldn't wait to get into that place. If someone called in a lie about how you were treating you children wouldn't you want the local cops to check out the authenticity of that report before the took you to court and took your children away?????
I hate the thought of child rape, it would be a capital crime. I think religious zealots are dangerous. I do support justice. Justice under our laws should be the right of every person mo matter if we agree with their religion of not.
20 posted on 04/22/2008 2:08:56 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson