Gee, just like any cops would be when they know an organization that habitually breaks the law has moved into town.
Then take it one step further and imagine how over zealous they were when a tiny unverified and unresearched crack appeared. I think that there are a lot of people wondering if somehow the local storm troopers didn't figure out a way to initiate the totally bogus and fake call them selves.
Can you cite some facts, because the FLDS has put up a website (http://captivefldschildren.org) and even they don't allege any activity I'd associate with "stormtroopers." They note that the cops showed at the gate with the proper warrants. They've got a whole page of photos that show a lot of cops and a Sheriff's office M-113, but don't look like any SWAT action I've ever seen. They do claim some kids were prevented from praying at the El Dorado Civic Center. I guess we'll see in court (criminal or a lawsuit if there are no convictions) whther that's true or not.
Why is your portrayal of law enforcement in this case so much harsher than that of the people whose home was raided and whose kids have been removed from their custody? Can you provide some data that will fill in the gap?
and has led to the court sponsored kidnap of over 400 children.
Kidnapping is a capital crime in the U.S. Shouldn't you produce some actual evidence before you accuse a number of people of a capital crime?
One thing is a for sure conclusion. the next time the cops in Texas knock on the door of one of these compounds they will be met with violence. They have made it quite clear that they residents of any communal living alternate belief system have nothing to loose by putting up a fight.
You're saying these people would start spraying bulllets around the place their kids live because they have "nothing to lose" by doing so? Dang, with friends like you, they don't need enemies!
They have learned that anyone can call from any location and tell a lie and then based on that lie without any verification or research that their children can be taken from them without any physical proof of any wrongdoing on their part.
1. So, the police can only repond to a report of a crime after they've investigated the reporter? So, if I hear a prowler tonight, the police should send a squad car by in a couple of days after they check my credit rating and three non-related references, or what?
2. Oh, so pregnant girls under the age of consent isn't physical evidence of a crime? Are you saying the cops held a seance, or what?