Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Says Surge Failed, & We Lost In Southern Iraq
Needs Of The Many ^
Posted on 11/28/2007 10:06:46 PM PST by vaper69
This guy is becoming even more of an idiot than I thought. It's ok to want out of Iraq, but it's another thing to lie about it in order to get votes.
He was properly smacked by McCain for his comments. To which Ron Paul supporters tried to boo McCain, but were drowned out with cheers for McCain as McCain schooled Paul on the facts of Vietnam.
I will post video as soon as I have it, and the latest numbers of a decline in violence in Iraq. Which Paul says is because the Brits are pulling out of Basra. Problem is that the violence in Basra declined 80% WHILE the Brits were there. They are pulling out because there is no more need for them there.
Update:
Here is a graph that shows the decline in violence in Iraq since the surge.
(Excerpt) Read more at needsofthemany.blogspot.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; artbell; cutandrun; davidicke; iraq; nutters; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulkucinich2008; peacecreeps; reptilians; ronpaul; rontards; scampi; surge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
11/28/2007 10:06:48 PM PST
by
vaper69
To: Allegra
2
posted on
11/28/2007 10:08:47 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: vaper69
We Lost? We did? And this baboon wants to be the Commander in Chief?????
3
posted on
11/28/2007 10:10:55 PM PST
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: vaper69
Ron Paul cannot be trusted to defend America. He has no intent to do so. Simple as that.
4
posted on
11/28/2007 10:12:29 PM PST
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: vaper69
I thought he said that the violence was down in the south cuz Al Sadr had the region controlled and that’s why the Brits were able to pull out?
5
posted on
11/28/2007 10:30:22 PM PST
by
mommya
To: vaper69
Ron paul: America’s Baghdad Bob.
To: Proud2BeRight
Ron paul: Americas Baghdad Bob.
I think you are so right.
7
posted on
11/28/2007 10:48:53 PM PST
by
pandoraou812
( Its NOT for the good of the children! Its BS along with bending over for Muslim's demands)
To: vaper69; Army Air Corps; elhombrelibre; lormand
What an unmitigated load of crap.
Ron Paul is as bad as Nancy and Harry, if not worse.
8
posted on
11/28/2007 11:11:21 PM PST
by
Allegra
(Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
To: vaper69
The best way to get rid of Nutsy Fagan is for the Dem nomination race to heat up - no cross-party voting in the primaries that way.
Unfortunately, he’s going to do well enough in NH to stay in for a while longer (remember the LP’s Free State Project?).
9
posted on
11/28/2007 11:15:06 PM PST
by
decal
(This tagline is subject to change without noti........)
To: mommya
I think he actually said violence was down because the Brits moved out and the Sadr army moved in.
10
posted on
11/28/2007 11:21:14 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: mommya
” Already, part of their country has been taken back. In the south, they claim the surge has worked, but the surge really hasn’t worked. There’s less violence, but al-Sadr has essentially won in the south.
The British are leaving. The brigade of Al Sadr now is in charge, so they are getting their country back. They’re in charge up north — the Shia — the people in the north are in charge, as well, and there’s no violence up there or nearly as much.”
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/28/debate.transcript.part2/index.html
11
posted on
11/28/2007 11:26:53 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: vaper69
I will post video as soon as I have it, and the latest numbers of a decline in violence in Iraq. Which Paul says is because the Brits are pulling out of Basra. Problem is that the violence in Basra declined 80% WHILE the Brits were there. They are pulling out because there is no more need for them there. The violence is significantly down all over Iraq. What's Paul's leftist-mantra excuse for the huge drop in incidents in Anbar Province? In Baghdad? In Mosul? In Tal Afar? I could go on, but you get my drift.
The sad thing is, Ron Paul can say any outlandish, moonbatty thing he wants and his followers will eat it right up without question.
The mark of a true cult leader.
12
posted on
11/29/2007 3:37:08 AM PST
by
Allegra
(Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
To: Allegra
Not only is Ron Paul losing his grip on reality, he may be downright dangerous.
13
posted on
11/29/2007 4:42:19 AM PST
by
corlorde
(New Hampshire)
To: Allegra
The only thing more embarrassing than Run Paul is his support here on FreeRepublic.
14
posted on
11/29/2007 7:21:46 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(It's not easy being a Run Paul defeatist on Iraq, but a few annoying freepers work at it.)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Grampa Dave
I have the video, and I’ve added some other things to the post. Follow the link to get the updates.
16
posted on
11/29/2007 12:35:09 PM PST
by
vaper69
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
17
posted on
11/29/2007 10:27:33 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, November 27, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
My goodness, even Murtha is coming around. Does this mean Ron Paul is worse?
18
posted on
11/30/2007 2:40:41 AM PST
by
Berosus
("The candidates that can't face Fox News can't face Al Qaeda."--Roger Ailes)
To: Berosus; Nervous Tick
MRSA, oops, I mean Murtha, and Ron Paul are idealogically in overlap; however, MRSA is canny enough to understand when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em. That old crook has another, hmm, three? five? years to go.
Nervous Tick has a great tagline — “Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org)”
19
posted on
11/30/2007 9:09:01 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, November 27, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: vaper69
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Soros.
A vote for Ron Puul is a vote for Al Qaeda.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Don Black.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for defeat.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for treason.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote against Israel.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote against America.
20
posted on
11/30/2007 10:44:52 AM PST
by
End Times Crusader
(!!!!!!!!!ELECT RON PAUL AS PRESIDENT OR THE WORLD WILL END!!!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson